[Theodore R.]

It must be hard on the Levys knowing that they had helped to create the career of Congressman Condit and Bill Clinton for that matter -- could this make them question their judgment on other matters? Like how do they "know" Condit is the culprit, if they thought previously that Condit was an ideal congressman? Maybe they can't analyze the situation objectively. Isn't it still true that there is no real evidence that Condit was involved in Miss Levy's disappearance, or am I missing something?

[Ditter]

Being upset that they supported condit is the least of the things they have on their minds right now, it may bother them someday, but not now.

Do they have evidence? I don't know what they have other than the fact that they were lovers & he has acted as guilty as sin.

[Revolting cat!]

Isn't it still true that there is no real evidence that Condit was involved in Miss Levy's disappearance, or am I missing something?

That depends on the meaning of "real evidence". I mean there is no "real evidence" that he had an affair with her or the Smith girl, either, which is why he's denying both or at least one of them. But circumstancial evidence points to him having seen her or having attempted to see her on the afternoon of May 1 near the Klingle mansion, in fact I think that's nearly certain, and that suggests that he was "involved" with her disappearance even if he did not directly cause it.