Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilDragoo;shigure;willyboyishere;jude24;Lancey Howard; agrace;Illbay;Registered;Jalapeno
DAY 892 WRONGLY IMPRISONED WITHOUT TRIAL ON EXTORTED FALSE CONFESSION

See Ted's appeal above and a vast panoply of exculpatory evidence below.

~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~

MONACO DARE NOT ALLOW THESE ANOMALIES TO BE EXAMINED BY THE WORLD MEDIA

>Videotape from the penthouse security camera(s) "missing"

>The police emergency tape from December 3, 1999 "missing"

>The cell phone records for Edmond and Vivian suppressed

>Sonia's three accounts in the fire report contradictory

>The first official Monaco press report stated two intruders

>Initial reports said Mr. Safra was shot twice as was Lily's second husband Alfredo Monteverde who left her two hundred million dollars shooting himself twice in the heart

>Lily changed Edmond's will shortly before his death

>Lily changed their citizenship to Monagasque before his death

>Boaz Bismuth said "the lady" sent the security team away

>"Someone" disconnected the burglar alarm July 1, 1999

>No autopsy report has been released

>Multiple ignition sources reported in the fire report

>"Sudden conflagration" at 6:00 a.m.--an hour after Ted was rushed to Princess Grace Hospital with knife wounds

>False ceilings, a trap door to the attic, special air handling equipment for independent ventilation to Edmond and Lily

>Steel roller blinds controlled separately for Edmond from an electric panel which "failed" during the attack, the blinds made manually inoperable by covering the hand crank access with "decoration"--yet Lily's remained open allowing her "escape"

>Lily had Edmond buried in Switzerland despite his lifelong wish to be buried in Israel--thwarting exhumation?

>Lily wouldn't allow the brothers near the coffin at the funeral

>The police claim Ted knifed himself--yet no medical professional would risk deadly infection by cutting himself over the intestines, and the wound locations made them extremely awkward for Ted to have caused, and the wounds required one hundred staples to close and multiple transfusions--making them far more likely to have been defensive wounds suffered in an attack than self-inflicted, and the police had TWO knives

>The police suppressed and destroyed Ted's original clothing which was slashed and bloody from the attack, provided instead brand-new undamaged and unstained sportswear, clothing Ted did not own and which would have been forbidden to be worn on shift tending Mr. Safra

>The prosecutor claimed Ted was using drugs, but the hospital tests showed Ted negatif negatif negatif for drugs and alcohol

>Lily paid her medical supervisor Sonia Casiano-Herkrath one hundred thousand dollars in a "confidentiality agreement"--and it was Sonia's [contradictory] testimony that is the sole account of Edmond and Vivian's calls and condition

>False confession in French--Ted does not read/write/speak

>Three days in four-point restraint, catheterized, sleep-deprived

>Police kidnap Heidi, steal passport, use to threaten Ted

>Photos and tapes of children used to threaten Ted

>Ted's mail and telephone communication suppressed Consular visits must be prompted by repeated complaint Even his priest's visits have been prevented on flimsy pretext

>Judge D'Instruction Patricia Richet hugged Lily, screamed at Ted, "I know that you are guilty!" tore up children's letters

578 posted on 5/14/02 6:01 PM Pacific by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply

68 posted on 05/23/2002 10:43:54 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Thanks for the ping to this. What a strange case. As you no doubt read, I simply commented on the fact that this story seems so different from the threads I have read before on FR. I have a couple of questions too -

If Ted was attacked and stabbed by intruders, why is he retracting that now and his lawyers trying to get it stricken from court records? And why is there talk of his accidentally starting a fire in a wastebasket and seeming to acknowledge that he is responsible for it? It doesn't make sense. Is there that much coercion and intimidation involved, or are these not the facts and Court TV has it wrong somehow. I read his handwritten statement that they have linked from the article and while he doesn't clarify, he does acknowledge some level of responsibility - to what is he referring? I would think that Court TV is not exactly a disreputable source.

Any thoughts? I haven't yet read further down the thread so forgive me if these points were already addressed and please direct me to the appropriate posts. Thanks.

114 posted on 05/24/2002 6:56:10 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson