1.It's very easy to decide that Ted Maher is guilty if one has no time to read beyond what the NY Times & other prostituted media tell you
This is empty and lame without some indication of why "the NY Times & other prostituted media" decided to take Monaco's side and fabricate a bunch of highly negative stories about Maher. And why would they risk fabricating these stories and quotes from Maher acquaintances when these stories and quotes could so easily be refuted or confirmed? No. As much as I despise the NY Times and Time Magazine I don't think they just went and made up these stories.
2. It's understandable, especially when Ted comes out with a statement that seems to be saying he's not completely without fault.
"Seems to be saying"? C'mon... That is what the statement IS saying.
3. If he steadfastly continues to talk about "intruders," then Monaco is forced to deal with it accordingly. They must protect their "safe" image since their economy is based on tourism.
Sorry, no sale.
You really think that Monaco is afraid the world will wag its finger because of this once-a-decade murder case?
And Monaco is scared that its tourism economy might dry up??
So they go to all the time and effort to frame an innocent nobody - - to save their tourism industry.
You gotta be kidding me.