[Lancey Howard]

You would be overpowered with all the unanswered questions that Monaco is hiding.

Who, exactly, is the source of all those items listed in post #118?
Who, exactly, is it that says that Monaco is hiding something?
Is there anything at all for me to hang my hat on with regard to giving Maher a benefit of the doubt? Anything solid at all? Or does all the information about "exonerating evidence", "missing evidence", drugs and torture, and all the rest come from Maher's camp?
Thanks!

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

"Is there anything at all for me to hang my hat on with regard to giving Maher a benefit of the doubt?"

How about over 2 years with no trial date set.
Now why would a small country like that STILL not be able to set a trial date?
This has been going on since Dec of 1999.
I still believe in innocent until proven guilty.

[Nita Nupress]

Who, exactly, is the source of all those items listed in post #118?
Who, exactly, is it that says that Monaco is hiding something?

First, don't you think that some of us would have been sued by now if Monaco and Lily Safra didn't have something to hide?  At least get one of those cute little cease and desist letters?  

The information in #118 came from several sources, some of which I can share.  Some of it came from hours of background  research; some of it came from inductive and deductive reasoning after reading it; and some of it came from watching the particular combination of  well-known people with reputations to protect get involved in this case.  And yes, some of it came from corresponding with various members of the family.  

By the way, have you read the two or three places on this thread where I've stated I'm not 100% sure that Mr. Maher is  innocent?  What is it about those statements you don't understand?  And are you telling us that you're 100% sure that this American is guilty?  If you're not, does that mean your mind is already made up without even seeing the evidence?

Is there anything at all for me to hang my hat on with regard to giving Maher a benefit of the doubt? 

Does that mean you're okay with an American being thrown in jail for life without being allowed to all his evidence into trial?  Just what would it take for you to "give Maher the benefit of the doubt?"   What exactly is it that you need "to hang your hat on?"  What would it take for you to even entertain the thought that this man just may have been a victim of a Russian mob hit and Monaco's need for a tidy little wrap-up?

Probably something like an autopsy or DNA analysis, right?   

Gee, wouldn't that be nice?