Why am I not surprised?
Could it be they are too...liberal?
1 posted on
05/23/2002 6:28:53 PM PDT by
fortress
To: fortress
They give it away on-line, without the mess, the fuss, and all the ads. What kind of fool pays for that junk anyway?
To: fortress
Oregonian Circulation DownI was going to suggest Viagra...guess I misread the title.
3 posted on
05/23/2002 6:42:25 PM PDT by
ZOOKER
To: fortress
To celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Washington Times, new subscribers during the month of May will receive a subscription for one year for $20 (minus Sundays). It would be great for the Washington Post to lose circulation while the WT gained. Anyone meaning to subscribe but procrastinating, now's the time. Such a deal!
4 posted on
05/23/2002 6:43:12 PM PDT by
Ligeia
To: fortress
Why is this news??? Maybe if they had only two liberal editorials to every one conservative instead of the current 4:1, they might increase their circulation?
To: fortress; Prodigal Daughter
>Could it be they are too...liberal?Yes. The public is no longer "buying it." A Sam Newhouse paper rated a few years ago as the most liberal paper in the U.S. in cities over 125,000.
9 posted on
05/24/2002 2:05:16 AM PDT by
2sheep
To: fortress
Great news! I can't think of a newspaper that deserves a falling circulation more than "The Oregonian" does.
To: fortress
You have to factor in that Oregon has the highest unemployment in the nation. For the unemployed, a newspaper is a non-essential.
14 posted on
05/24/2002 12:25:05 PM PDT by
aimhigh
To: fortress
16 posted on
05/24/2002 1:37:29 PM PDT by
Glutton
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson