Skip to comments.
USA Radio Reporting That DC "Suspect" MURDERED TWO WOMEN
USA Radio News ^
| 5/23/02
| EggsAckley
Posted on 05/23/2002 3:26:57 PM PDT by EggsAckley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Illbay
1. I NEVER wrote that I thought Condit was guilty, just that I don't want him to walk free due to media shenanigans.
2. This IS worth my energy due to the fact that several million people receive this radio station, and were being given totally false information.
3. If Condit DOES get indicted and go to trial, it's THIS kind of fact tampering that causes disasters like OJ. Oh, I suppose you think HE'S innocent too.
Question: If you think this is so silly, why do YOU waste energy writing a huge post belittling it?
If you don't like it, IGNORE IT.
To: EggsAckley
I'm glad we could promote the spread of Truth. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't USA Radio News the network which feeds most Christian radio stations across the nation? I recall hearing them mentioned (perhaps erroneously) on a local Pensacola station a while back. In any event, glad to see their editorial staff picking the ball back up!
FReegards, friend!
:) ttt
42
posted on
05/23/2002 5:09:58 PM PDT
by
detsaoT
To: EggsAckley
Excellent work!
Every time the media is set straight, a message is sent that we are keeping a critical eye on them at all times.
43
posted on
05/23/2002 5:15:25 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: EggsAckley
Eggs,over lightly,I learned a lot from your post ,thank you.
44
posted on
05/23/2002 5:18:00 PM PDT
by
fatima
To: EggsAckley
Richard Bey on WABC radio (NYC) did the same thing today -- claiming this man "murdered" two women in Rock Creek Park.
Bey is the liberal half of the talk team (Steve Malzberg is the conservative half, but he didn't correct Bey).
To: EggsAckley
Note that the part where they were lying is in bold. And your proof that they were lying?
46
posted on
05/23/2002 5:30:07 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: EggsAckley
This IS worth my energy due to the fact that several million people receive this radio station, and were being given totally false information. 3. If Condit DOES get indicted and go to trial, it's THIS kind of fact tampering that causes disasters like OJ. Oh, I suppose you think HE'S innocent too Do you live in Washington DC or in Va near DC? If not, your stupid radio station isnt going to affect any potential jury. BTW, does tossing the word "lying" around make you feel more important?
47
posted on
05/23/2002 5:35:33 PM PDT
by
Dave S
To: EggsAckley
Thanks for the post.
I am glad you are trying to keep the media stragiht. Why some of the replies are negative about your post doesn't make sense to me.
To: EggsAckley
"Who knows, maybe honesty in media isn't important to anyone anymore." Well, it sure as hell isn't important to the media.
49
posted on
05/23/2002 5:56:21 PM PDT
by
okie01
To: EggsAckley
FWIW, I have commented VERY little on Condit threads, simply because I know that I--like the rest of you--have NO personal knowledge that would lead me to believe that Condit was guilty.
That's not the case with O.J., btw. That man had far, far more than mere circumstantial evidence against him. And no matter what anyone might say, O.J. got off NOT because of a high-powered legal team, nor because of the ineptitude of the prosecution, but because they had a black jury in Los Angeles.
That said, I'm simply asking if you have any REAL reason to think this guy did it. Usually, when I have in the past asked that question, I get the same response that you gave: "If you don't agree then shut up and get out of this thread!"
Not a very convincing argument.
BTW, the police--not the media--have continually said Condit's not a suspect. The guy is as sleazy and corrupt as his pal Bill Clinton, but there's simply no evidence that he murdered this girl. If evidence does arise, then it will be a different story.
But so far, people like you foaming at the mouth about this are basing all your opinions on the fact the guy's a Democrat, and arrogant.
50
posted on
05/23/2002 7:33:29 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: FR_addict
I'm not criticizing the guy's post, just his flimsy logic, which is shared by a great many FReepers. I haven't heard ANYONE give a real reason for their certitude that Condit murdered the girl. And all this fire-breathing on the subject is just as odious as what the Leftists do to mischaracterize conservatives.
It's intellectually vapid, and I hate to see conservatives doing it.
51
posted on
05/23/2002 7:37:22 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Dave S
52
posted on
05/23/2002 9:07:40 PM PDT
by
VMI70
To: EggsAckley
Yes, the media is twisting and turning in the whole story, manufacturing false information. They can't be stopped, unfortunately-- they're in the business to sell news. The media is running amok.
To: Illbay
done
To: Illbay
It's intellectually vapid, and I hate to see conservatives doing it. It's a gut reaction to an evil, twisted soul-- all the way along, people like you have nay-sayed condidits' involvement-- he is the most likely SUSPECT (now that there is a body and a crime and the former boyfriend looks and acts increasingly suspicious.) He will follow his attorneys' advice and say NOTHING-- like Ted Kennedy, the Ramseys-- and let suspicion follow him wherever he goes.
To: let freedom sing
BTW, I don't "naysay" anything--except that I can't possibly know if the guy is guilty or innocent. I have NO IDEA, do you understand that?
And neither does anyone here.
But that doesn't matter to them. They see he's sleazy and oily, and a DEMOCRAT for goshsake! He HAS to be guilty.
In reality, they are simply seeking to use Condit as a weapon against the Dems, and I am simply surprised that, after eight years of the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Administration, where all the information anyone would need to conclude these people were liars, thugs, traitors and worse, anyone would still think this matters to the masses of people out there who only think about voting three days before the polls open.
Condit got tossed by the DEMS in his district, which was appropriate. Presumption of innocence doesn't mean you get another free two-year stint suckin' at the public teat. I wish that ALL voters, Rep and Dem, were so fastidious--we'd never have another Alcee Hastings.
But in the end you CANNOT know this man murdered the girl, or had her murdered. You have the right to believe what you want, but someone needs to throw a little cold water when you people get so heated up.
56
posted on
05/24/2002 7:04:02 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Illbay
They see he's sleazy and oily, and a DEMOCRAT for goshsake! He HAS to be guilty That's enough information, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. LOL
To: sinkspur; Illbay
You and Bill are Condit's two most reliable defenders on FR. You boys jump in here and fight for him, now. ahaha
58
posted on
05/24/2002 1:59:00 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
You and Bill are Condit's two most reliable defenders on FRYou're up to your eyeballs in fecal matter, as usual.
My post up the thread is exactly the FIRST time I've EVER made a comment about this whole Levy business. And that includes last summer as well.
Frankly, I don't give a damn who killed her. I'm just not into ambulance chasing.
59
posted on
05/24/2002 2:34:58 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Actually, I'm trying to find out which neocon pundit took the position that you and your boy are taking here. I know that neither of you are equipped for original thought, so you're aping someone for sure. You're both still democrats at heart.
60
posted on
05/24/2002 4:01:58 PM PDT
by
Twodees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson