Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneD; Miss Marple; freedomcrusader; Poohbah
I think the deal was along the lines of, "Confirm Brooks Smith, and I won't be so blunt about your obstruction."

We've got a Dem memo where they ADMIT they are less than truthful about the Social Security debate, and now this. Looks like a "doom on you" week for the Dems. Which, as readers of Rogue Warrior books know, is a politeway of say that the Dems are... [deleted to avoid trouble with the moderators]...

4 posted on 05/23/2002 11:57:48 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
I tend to agree that they confirmed this judge because they were catching grief for obstructing in general and for crucifying Pickering. They don't want to kill all the conservative nominations (too obvious), just an occasional one.
6 posted on 05/23/2002 12:04:00 PM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch
Marcinko bump...
7 posted on 05/23/2002 12:04:07 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson