Skip to comments.
3 Democrats Join Senate Panel In Approving a Criticized Judge
The New York Times ^
| 5/23/02
| David Stout
Posted on 05/23/2002 11:47:49 AM PDT by GeneD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
1
posted on
05/23/2002 11:47:51 AM PDT
by
GeneD
To: GeneD
I doubt the dems did it for nothing. Wonder what Bush either promised them or promised not to do to them...
To: freedomcrusader
I thought Biden had been fighting this appointment tooth and nail. Something foul is in the works.
3
posted on
05/23/2002 11:56:04 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: GeneD; Miss Marple; freedomcrusader; Poohbah
I think the deal was along the lines of, "Confirm Brooks Smith, and I won't be so blunt about your obstruction."
We've got a Dem memo where they ADMIT they are less than truthful about the Social Security debate, and now this. Looks like a "doom on you" week for the Dems. Which, as readers of Rogue Warrior books know, is a politeway of say that the Dems are... [deleted to avoid trouble with the moderators]...
4
posted on
05/23/2002 11:57:48 AM PDT
by
hchutch
To: GeneD; Miss Marple; Howlin
Senator Edwards said he thought the judge would apply the law regardless of his personal views,
Well now, is that a look down the road to 04?
5
posted on
05/23/2002 12:03:36 PM PDT
by
deport
To: hchutch
I tend to agree that they confirmed this judge because they were catching grief for obstructing in general and for crucifying Pickering. They don't want to kill all the conservative nominations (too obvious), just an occasional one.
6
posted on
05/23/2002 12:04:00 PM PDT
by
Coop
To: hchutch
Marcinko bump...
7
posted on
05/23/2002 12:04:07 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: mwl1
My money is on a filibuster. We'll have 56 or 57 votes, but not the 60 to break a filibuster. It would be a high-risk thing for the Dems. A filibuster would be VERY public, and it could reinforce the "no class" impression of the Dems in a number of the states where Bush did pretty well in that have Dems up.
But at the same time, the Dems could try it to publicly trash ALL the nominees, particularly Estrada, without letting them defend themselves.
8
posted on
05/23/2002 12:06:04 PM PDT
by
hchutch
To: deport; Coop
The issue of his membership in the all-male Spruce Creek Rod and Gun Club first arose in 1988I will remember this and I myself will make an 'issue' of the fact that Mr. Edwards has a "home" in a GATED, GUARDED PRIVATE ISLAND off the coast of North Carolina.
9
posted on
05/23/2002 12:09:11 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: deport
Say, wasn't Edwards ojection to the last guy his personal views?
Apparently Edwards got a clue from that one, since so many attorneys were appalled at his grandstanding.
10
posted on
05/23/2002 12:11:02 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: hchutch
Couldn't Daschle still prevent this from coming up for a vote even though it made it out of Committee? Surely he still thinks 60 is a majority and if his grandmother's sister's nephew's wife doesn't think it'll pass, he won't allow the whole Senate to vote on it.
11
posted on
05/23/2002 12:12:16 PM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Coop; Miss Marple
You know, we could probably ramp up the criticism over Estrada, and that could show the Dems for who they are. Stories like Estrada's are what this country is about, IMHO. We can use this on a wide front.
I swear, why is it nobody at the RNC has thought to retaliate when the Dems play the race card by running ads in the black and Hispanic communities highlighting the Klan recruiter (and a person who used the N word) that they elevated to third in the line of succession to the Presidency?
Turn the race card on the Dems for once. HARD.
12
posted on
05/23/2002 12:12:24 PM PDT
by
hchutch
To: Howlin
Personally, I think it was more along the lines of his McCarthy-like tendencies against Pickering. That had to make a lot of people flinch.
13
posted on
05/23/2002 12:13:42 PM PDT
by
hchutch
To: GeneD
The issue of his membership in the all-male Spruce Creek Rod and Gun Club first arose in 1988, when President Ronald Reagan nominated him for a federal district judgeship. Judge Smith pledged to try to change the male-only policy of the club, but his foes say he did not try very hard, and that he only quit the club in 1999, after a vacancy on the Third Circuit came up. Looks like another Ralph Neas smear.
14
posted on
05/23/2002 12:14:48 PM PDT
by
Hacksaw
To: hchutch
That's who I meant.......I just couldn't think of his name!
15
posted on
05/23/2002 12:22:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: GeneD
Dems; "No evidence he's a Christian. Let him in..."
16
posted on
05/23/2002 12:25:47 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: hchutch
I agree. I don't know why we hardly ever hear/see anything about Democrat Senator Robert Byrd - Ku Klux Klan. Sure, it was a while back, but so were Pickering's supposed indiscretions.
17
posted on
05/23/2002 12:30:05 PM PDT
by
Coop
To: GeneD
Specter made a digusting deal.....no doubt about it........this is either a thank for something we have yet to discern or for something in the future.
To: OldFriend
Well, it could be that we have some behind the scenes hardball being played. You know, appealing to them to do this in the spirit of bi-partisanship didn't work. It still hadn't registered on a lot of the public that this was being blocked.
However, the dems overreached with their disgusting performance last week. I wonder what sorts of things were laid before these senators as threats, because regardless of what many of the people here think, President Bush paid attention to Lee Atwater quite a bit, and he is not averse to leaning on people hard when he has to.
To: Constitution Day
ping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson