Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tall_Texan
I don't own a dog but I don't think I would just let one randomly start digging in a public area. I'm getting conflicting info on exactly how the body was found - whether it was buried, covered or just laying there. Burying would imply an act to hide evidence, covered might

On hearing this story, my 12 year old son who couldn't figure out why the guy would be "digging" for turtles in the woods. He claimed they don't burrow in the ground.

139 posted on 05/23/2002 11:54:45 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Chandra's remains were covered by about 12 inches of brush and leaves. The leaves fell in November (some of the remains were not disturbed by the turtle hunter, and the leaves date the placement of the body at least back to that time. They were also covered with some soil, but this might be due to settling and weathering - they might not have been buried "in a shallow grave" as was earlier reported. On the other hand, the killer might have made some efforts to hide his kill.

Old turtle (tortoise)shells do get covered with soil - I used to hunt for them myself when I was a kid. They would be somewhat embedded in the dirt/humus in the woods.

155 posted on 05/23/2002 12:01:05 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
The guy wasn't digging, he was just looking for turtles. The dog took off after catching a scent, and it was the dog that started digging.
172 posted on 05/23/2002 12:15:32 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson