Posted on 05/23/2002 8:52:01 AM PDT by countrydummy
OH GOOD GOD!! ISN'T ANYONE THINKING OF THE POOR GRASS THAT IS TO BE UNABASHEDLY ATTACKED BY THE INSENSITIVE CATTLE!
: )
This will drive the PETA/ELF/ALF whackos right over the edge even more than they are now.
That's very generous of the bums!!
FMCDH
Molon Labe !!
VENEMAN DESIGNATES ARIZONA AS DROUGHT DISASTER AREA
Governor Hull and Veneman Tour Fire Areas and Assess Damage in Prescott National Forest Areas
PHOENIX, Ariz., May 17, 2002-- Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman today designated the entire state of Arizona as a drought disaster area. This designation makes Arizona farmers and ranchers immediately eligible for USDA emergency farm loans due to losses caused by drought this year.
“We have heard from your governor and congressional delegation first hand about the impact the drought has had in Arizona,” Veneman said. “This emergency assistance will help farmers and ranchers recover from these devastating effects and losses.”
Veneman made the announcement at the state capital with Governor Jane Hull and Congressional Representatives John Shadegg and J.D. Hayworth . Arizona state Agriculture Director Sheldon Jones also was in attendance.
http://www.usda.gov/news/releases/2002/05/0197.htm
Cattle Growers' Association Wins Suit Against Endangered Species Act Enforcement
DATE: January 28, 2002
BACKGROUND: Arizona rancher Jeff Menges and the Arizona Cattle Growers' Association won an appeal against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over "incidental takings" in an endangered species case. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco voted 3-0 to uphold lower court rulings that found that the USFWS imposed "terms and conditions on land use permits, where there either was no evidence that the endangered species existed on the land or no evidence that a take would occur if the permit were issued."
TEN SECOND RESPONSE: Finally a federal court has agreed that enforcement of the Endangered Species Act is getting out of hand. The Fish and Wildlife Service and environmental groups should now follow the court's ruling.
THIRTY SECOND RESPONSE: Common sense finally won and the court realized that before restrictions can be placed on land use, an endangered species must be found in the area. In the past, too many ranchers and other landowners have been denied use of their own land because there is a possibility an endangered species might wander onto their land. Environmental groups should let the agency do its work of protecting wildlife instead of having to spend its time and effort in courtrooms.
DISCUSSION: The federal agencies' interpretation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) resulted in closing 400,000 acres of federal land to grazing under the theory that grazing would harm the razorback sucker and pygmy owl. However, the lower court found that the USFWS in its Biological Opinion "failed to provide sufficient reason to believe that listed species exist in the allotments in question." On December 17, 2001 the Appeals Court agreed with the lower court on all but one Biological Opinion in question.
The original lawsuit was filed by the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, claiming that the grazing permitted on federal lands was harming habitat even though the endangered species were not currently found on those allotments. "The very absence of a species is an indication of ongoing harm due to habitat degradation," according to Martin Taylor, coordinator of the Center's grazing reform program.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: To read the decision by the Ninth Circuit Court, visit: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/9916102p.pdf.
Thanks for the post, countrydummy, and thanks for the ping, madfly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.