Skip to comments.
Terror Threat To NYC Landmarks (Brooklyn Bridge and Statue of Liberty targeted)
CBS News Channel 2 ^
| 5/21/02
Posted on 05/21/2002 3:06:37 PM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: tyop
The only reason why I think this not just rhetoric from the government is because they overheard two detainees at guatanamo Bay talking about NYC Landmarks being targets for an attack.
To: areafiftyone
When Bush stops the lies that Isalm is peaceful the sooner we get what has to be done done!
4
posted on
05/21/2002 3:18:37 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
Get Hillary down to defend the bridge.
TO THE BARRACADES !
To: Eric in the Ozarks
BUMP
6
posted on
05/21/2002 3:23:24 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
Blaming Bush for this and that... BOY, now is really going to accomplish something. NOT!
7
posted on
05/21/2002 3:38:05 PM PDT
by
A. Morgan
To: areafiftyone
Based on what happened on September 11, this may well be a misdirection ploy. The real targeting may involve the dismemberment of the National Command Authority in the DC region or major targets on the West Coast.
In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable.
8
posted on
05/21/2002 3:38:18 PM PDT
by
Fulbright
To: areafiftyone
NO change in the threat level, though.
To: Fulbright
Since they are good at hitting more than one target at the same time I would say its a good possiblity that East and West Coast may be hit at the same time.
To: A. Morgan
No one is blaming Bush. but it is Bush that says this is a peaceful religion when it isn't even a religion. It is satan itself!
11
posted on
05/21/2002 3:48:25 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: areafiftyone
I hope they have dogs at the tunnel entrances. It might hold traffic up, but there probably won't be many going into the city by car,anyway.
12
posted on
05/21/2002 3:48:55 PM PDT
by
Exit148
To: areafiftyone
OK - we want to know WHICH OFFICIALS ARE THE TIMES CITING as saying these things? They always hide behind generalizing unless its republican comments that they criticize then they publish first and last names!
To: Fulbright
In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable...In any event, a terror strike deriving from 1,400 years of bankrupt Islamic morality is inevitable...
To: areafiftyone
One more attack on American soil, and Arab/Muslim blood will run in the American streets. The people have had enough of being told about "diversity" and how peaceful islam is. Although I wouldn't condone it, one more attack will be enough to push many over the edge.
Deport them now, for our safety - and theirs.
15
posted on
05/21/2002 4:04:49 PM PDT
by
pocat
To: Fulbright
In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable. You sound like a typical talking-head liberal... and/or Pat Buchanan.
16
posted on
05/21/2002 4:11:32 PM PDT
by
SunStar
To: SunStar
Maybe e's a Pat Buchanan/Helen Thomas Love Child????? ;0)
To: all
There was just now a story on FOXNEWS about an sting gone wrong where terrorists were let into the country and lost by INS, or something to that effect. Can anyone find the story, I don't see it on FOX's site?
18
posted on
05/21/2002 4:14:56 PM PDT
by
sixmil
To: areafiftyone
On Tuesday, the State Department sent its annual report on terrorism to Congress. The report listed the same seven countries Iran, Sudan, Libya, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba and Syria as state sponsors of terrorism last year. What about Pakistan? Its ISI intelligence service has been proven to assist terrorists attack India. Also as theonly Islamic nation with a nuke arsenal, and the fact it has a large base of Islamic zealots with a chip on their shoulder, don't you think it is a bigger threat than most of the nations listed above eg Sudan, Cuba, Syria, and even Libya?
?????
19
posted on
05/21/2002 4:16:20 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
To: spetznaz
Actually some reports claim that if the kooks are to get weapons of mass destruction they shall either come from the Pakistanis covertly or from the Mafiya (Russian Mafia) with access to radiological material that happened to 'disappear.'
20
posted on
05/21/2002 4:21:48 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson