Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unintended Consequences 5 Days Later: The Political Gambit Liberals LOST!
Nearly Every News Source and Liberal Leader in the Nation

Posted on 05/21/2002 2:56:55 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Howlin
What the heck does "The Arab Street" mean? I'm totally clueless about that.

Picture a bunch of Arab "yoots" hanging out on a street corner making trouble.

We better not p*ss them off by defending ourselves.

41 posted on 05/22/2002 12:14:26 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What the heck does "The Arab Street" mean? I'm totally clueless about that.

It means a bunch of inbred, seventh-century, turd-world, savage cretins in filthy nightshirts who hate us with a burning passion because they are insanely jealous of our unparalleled successes in this world. --Kind of like the French, but worse.
42 posted on 05/22/2002 12:37:33 AM PDT by Thundergod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
It is going to be oil and enron and dick cheney, that is the rats plan of attack. It will not work but they will try it. They are rats!
43 posted on 05/22/2002 12:48:40 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And next week we'll be hearing them WHINE about all the alerts! Count on it!

Absolutely! We are increasing anxiety among Americans! We are abusing our security forces! We can't say where or when the next attack will occur! Whine! Whine! Whine!

44 posted on 05/22/2002 4:47:45 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sharkdiver
Uniformed bump.
45 posted on 05/22/2002 5:08:32 AM PDT by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I believe, though, the current flurry of "terrorism is inevitable" warnings are more a reaction to the politicizing of the war by liberals than a real new threat.

How about this? In a brilliant countermove Bush et al have seized the opportunity to 1: report the warnings and 2: heighten our anxiety level so that 3: we are all for increased defense spending, securing our borders and most front-burner 4:taking care of Iraq. Again, I say brilliant. Checkmate. We do not have amateurs running around the White House now. These folks know what they are doing.

46 posted on 05/22/2002 5:16:14 AM PDT by ncpastor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Maybe Bush's positives went up slightly, but I think the real story would be a drastic rise in the Dems' negatives. I would love to see the polling on that.
47 posted on 05/22/2002 5:32:03 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Yes, I heard those seminar callers on C-SPAN. I wonder who gave the go-ahead for that. Terry McAwful presumably approved the plan, but I don't think he would have done something like this without instructions from one or both of the Clintons.
48 posted on 05/22/2002 5:33:09 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thundergod
But is that a new expression, or have I totally missed that. I started hearing it recently and was totally clueless about what it meant. Are there other "streets" I don't know about? :-)
49 posted on 05/22/2002 8:37:36 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat;all
As long as the media (Rather, etc.) are allowed to get away with such liberal bias , the Democrats are protected. Does anyone know the laws concerning corporations meeting in secret (i.e. the Big Oil, etc. were brought before Rep. Barr on charges of collusion-why not the newscorps)? And if the news media actually out-an-out lie, can't they have their licenses pulled? They've done both things.
50 posted on 05/22/2002 8:54:43 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techcor
"And if the news media actually out-an-out lie, can't they have their licenses pulled?"

The second that option was even discussed by someone in the Bush Administration the calls of Facisim would ring out all around liberall LaLa-land(California, New York, Chicago, and most of the institutions of Higher Learning!)

51 posted on 05/22/2002 9:09:01 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
Bush did not get confirmation on his FBI director until AUGUST!

This needs restating. The lameness of the CIA and FBI are direct results of the downsizing and poor choice leadership selections of the Clinton Administration. Hillary above all should have forseen this obvious conclusion on the part of the dumbed down masses.

52 posted on 05/22/2002 9:13:43 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Rush is talking about this now. Said the Dems have done a 180.
53 posted on 05/22/2002 9:14:10 AM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Martial Law.
54 posted on 05/22/2002 9:26:57 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Ah, but if we could just get them under oath for questioning it would go like this:
"Did you or anyone in your organization ever meet in secret to suppress stories on any of the following:

1. Monica Lewinsky testifying that Bill Clinton told her a spy was working out of the White House.
2. The Vince Foster Suicide or any related materials.
Then add a few more episodes that seem to be collusion. (BTW, the answer is number 2. They met sometime in April of 96 (pretty sure it was April 8).

Then do the same thing with several stories ending with their reports on his testimony under oath about the receiving of a million dollar "donation". Make sure they swear they are telling the truth, then prove them to be liars. Once their integrity is totally shot in front of the American people, their influence should drop to nothing.

55 posted on 05/22/2002 9:33:19 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Thank you . : - )
56 posted on 05/22/2002 6:34:54 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson