Posted on 05/21/2002 1:45:28 PM PDT by knighthawk
The road to Sept. 11
ATHENS When the hubbub about what the White House did or didn't know before Sept. 11 dies down, Congressional or other investigators should consider the specific warnings that friendly Arab intelligence services sent to Washington in the summer of 2001.
Jordan and probably Morocco advised U.S. and allied intelligence that Al Qaeda terrorists controlled by Osama bin Laden planned major airborne terrorist operations in the continental United States.
After verifying the authenticity and content of those messages, Washington-based investigators should find out how seriously they were considered and what defensive operational conclusions, if any, were drawn.
First, the Jordan case. Since the early 1990s, that kingdom's well-organized and efficient intelligence service, the General Intelligence Division (GID), has carefully tracked the CIA-trained or Pakistan-trained guerrillas - or terrorists, or freedom fighters, or whatever you choose to call them - who survived their victorious 1979-89 war to expel the Soviet invaders from Afghanistan.
On returning to their homelands, thousands of these Arab veterans organized Islamist uprisings or supported civil wars - in Egypt, Algeria, Sudan, the Philippines and Indonesia - or carried out specific terrorist acts (cinemas in Jordan; the World Trade Center in New York in 1993).
Jordan's GID hunted the returned fighters, capturing and bringing to justice several who became active terrorists. The GID aided the U.S. government in countless ways, even helping U.S. law enforcement officers to apprehend Al Qaeda and other operatives who had formed cells in the United States or Canada.
Sometime in the summer of 2001 GID headquarters in Amman, Jordan, made a communications intercept deemed so important that King Abdullah's men relayed its contents to Washington, probably through the CIA station at the U.S. Embassy in Amman.
To be doubly sure that the message got through, it was passed through an Arab intermediary to an Iranian-born German intelligence agent who was visiting Amman at the time.
The text stated clearly that a major attack was planned inside the continental United States. It said aircraft would be used. But neither hijacking, nor, apparently, precise timing nor targets were named. The code name of the operation was mentioned: in Arabic, Al Ourush al Kabir, "The Big Wedding."
When it became clear that the information about the intercept was embarrassing to Bush administration officials and congressmen who at first denied that there had been any such warnings before Sept. 11, senior Jordanian officials backed away from their earlier confirmations.
As for the Moroccan case, last November a French magazine and a Moroccan newspaper simultaneously reported a story that has since met a wall of silence.
The reports said that a Moroccan secret agent named Hassan Dabou succeeded in infiltrating Al Qaeda. Several weeks before Sept. 11, the story ran, he informed his chiefs in King Mohammed VI's royal intelligence service that Osama bin Laden's men were preparing "large-scale operations in New York in the summer or autumn of 2001." The warning was said to have been passed on to Washington.
Dabou was said to have told his bosses in Rabat that bin Laden was "very disappointed" by the failure of the first bombing of the World Trade Center in February 1993 to topple the towers.
Though Dabou won bin Laden's confidence at first, according to an unnamed French intelligence agent cited in the reports, after he was invited to the United States to tell his story he lost contact with Al Qaeda, curtailing his ability to help prevent Sept. 11. Nonetheless, the story goes, he was given asylum and a new identity in the United States and is said to be helping out in the "war on terror."
The first of these cases has been authenticated by this reporter. The second remains to be proved beyond doubt. But the moral of both is that no U.S. administration should ever downgrade or dismiss the help it gets from friendly countries, Arab or otherwise.
The writer, an American foreign correspondent, is author of “Unholy Wars: America, Afghanistan and International Terrorism,” which will appear in a third, updated edition this summer. He contributed this comment to the International Herald Tribune.
This is supposed to translate into "Dear President Bush, Osama will see to it that two planes fly into the WTC around 9 am on Sept. 11, 2001. There will be additional planes as well - one will hit the Pentagon."
Was Bush supposed to cancel all air travel and shut down the airline industry when he became President?
Welcome back, knighthawk.
My question to all these folks with 20/20 hindsight is a simple one: what happens next?
I don't think that's the problem. I think al-Qaeda has infiltrated our government. That's the two-ton elephant in the living room that nobody wants to talk about. I'm hoping that the attack on Bush means the administration is beginning to get close to some of the infiltrators.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.