Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
read the ratification debates themselves.

No support there. Cheap bluff.

11 posted on 05/22/2002 8:07:57 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
Cheap retort.
13 posted on 05/22/2002 8:11:43 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
Sorry, but the original intent of the Fourteenth Amendment is clearly that of incorporation:
Debate over the anti-KKK bill naturally required exposition of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, and none was better qualified to explain that section than its draftsman, Rep. John A. Bingham (R., Ohio):
Mr. Speaker, that the scope and meaning of the limitations imposed by the first section, fourteenth amendment of the Constitution may be more fully understood, permit me to say that the privileges and immunities of citizens of a State, are chiefly defined in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States.... These eight articles... never were limitations upon the power of the States, until made so by the fourteenth amendment. The words of that amendment, "no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" are an express prohibition upon every State of the Union .... Id. at pt. 2, Appendix 84 (Mar. 31, 1871).
This is a most explicit statement of the incorporation thesis by the architect of the Fourteenth Amendment.

63 posted on 05/28/2002 11:02:43 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson