...occasional cataclysmic catastrophe has ample evidence that no one could miss except some determined to deny it beforehand.
I don't see any evidence in this statement. Unsupported assertions are not science, and your thinly veiled condescending tone ("evidence that no one could miss") does not serve you well. Perhaps you would like to try again?
384 posted on 05/21/2002 9:05:47 AM PDT by exmarine