[codebreaker]

The truth is that for all the niceties exchanged on talk shows and with his colleagues, he was deeply intolerant of anyone willing to challenge him with resaonable discourse on creation vs. evolution theory.

Being that this is a primary affront to God, the professor should know what to expect.

[JediGirl]

The truth is that for all the niceties exchanged on talk shows and with his colleagues, he was deeply intolerant of anyone willing to challenge him with resaonable discourse on creation vs. evolution theory.

Being that this is a primary affront to God, the professor should know what to expect.

This is a primary affront to God in what way? How was he deeply intolerant? What did he do to show that intolerance? How do you define intolerant?

[tpaine]

The truth is that for all the niceties exchanged on talk shows and with his colleagues, he was deeply intolerant of anyone willing to challenge him with resaonable discourse on creation vs. evolution theory.

Most reasonable people look at the observed world about them, and agree that 2+2 = 4.

In effect, most creationists look at the world and insist:

-- No, 2+2+'X' = 4X. -- ['X' being their beliefs]

Thus, there can be no 'reasonable discourse'. This is not deep intolerance, it is simply an observable truth.