Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gladwin
"Some of the FR creationists do not believe in logic or evidence...[additionally] creationists do not address the strongest arguments for evolution..."

What "arguments for" are there?? What "logic"?? What "evidence"??

There can be only one truth to the matter of 'Big Bang/Evolutionism vs. Creationism. The only significent factor is evidence of a "designer" or creator....

Nobelist Linus Pauling puts the issue into perpective:

"A single cell, the smallest living unit, is "more complicated than New York City." "The 'simplist' self-sufficient cell has the capacity to produce thousands of different proteins and other molecules, at different times and under different conditions. Synthesis, degradation, energy generation, replication, maintanance of cell architecture, mobility, regulation, repair, communication -- ALL of these functions take place in virtually every cell, and each function itself requires the interaction of numerous parts...If any part of this incredibly complex biochemical machinery is not functioning properly, the cell will die.

Even Evolutionst-guru and Oxford University zoolologist Richard Dawkins himself admitted in his book, 'The Blind Watchmaker' that "biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose." He also concludes that every cell, either of a plant or animal, contains in its nucleus "a digitally coded database larger, in information content, than all 30 volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica put together."

Then there's Sir Fred Hoyle. He calculated that the odds of producing just the basic enzymes of life by chance are 1 in 1 with 40,000 zeros after it. We won't pile on with the research Behe and Johnson...

Life and creation just mere cosmic random acts? Huh?!? Still think it terribly backwards of creationists to ignore the evolutionist "proof"? To believe in evolutionism is truly believing in the absurd.

And the reason for the push and obsession with teaching evolutionism? 'The American Athiest' provides some chilling insight:

"But if death preceded man and was not a result of Adam's sin, then sin is fiction. If sin is fiction, then we have no need for a Savior...Evolution destroys utterly and finally the VERY REASON [FOR] JESUS' EARTHLY LIFE...If Jesus was not the Redeemer who died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing."

219 posted on 05/20/2002 7:20:03 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: F16Fighter
What "arguments for" are there?? What "logic"?? What "evidence"??

I rest my case.

229 posted on 05/20/2002 7:54:34 PM PDT by Gladwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson