Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Famed Harvard Biologist Gould Dies
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&ncid=716&e=2&u=/ap/20020520/ap_on_re_us/obit_gould ^ | 5/20/02 | yahoo

Posted on 05/20/2002 12:53:27 PM PDT by rpage3

See source for details....


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 961-966 next last
To: PatrickHenry
Boy you guys are circling the wagons today!

Having the wake yet?

421 posted on 05/21/2002 9:55:07 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
What truth? That there is an Allah? That he'll be reincarnated? Pray tell, what truth?

"What is truth?"
Pontius Pilate

Morality is a form of cooperation, but it evolved to help individual groups of humans. It can be applied between groups of humans, but that is not required.

For example, codebreaker believes that only creationists are going to heaven. In fact, he revels in his fantasy of Gould burning in hell. Yet, he would be horrified by the idea of himself burning in hell, with his skin blistering and flesh melting for all time. He can do this because he only applies his morality to his group of people, the creationists. Anything is ok for anyone else. This is exactly what Genghis or Hitler did. Morality, in humans, only seems to apply to the group that you are in.

Is this good, or just? No. It is just true.

I'm tempted to ask, "what truth?", but instead I will simply ask if you are presenting your claim of "society says" morality as descriptive or alternatively, as normative? Morality itself involves notions of "ought" and "should", not merely with what "is", in a descriptive sense.

There are numerous problems with understanding normative morality as a "society says" morality. For example, it becomes impossible to judge or critize another society, if there is no moral law above society. Then you've got the problem of which "society" to obey, the population at large, or just the people with the power to rule? If people have a moral obligation to obey whatever their society presently says to do, then for example, Germans in the Nazi era would have had at that time a moral obligation to participate in the murder of innocent people. There could never be any such thing as an immoral law. If courts and laws define what is moral, then neither laws nor governments could ever be immoral, even in principle, which renders incoherent the concept of moral reformation. Moral improvement under such a philosophy actually becomes unethical, an obvious absurdity.

Cordially,

422 posted on 05/21/2002 9:56:47 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
Seems pretty clear that morality is not your choice. Pretty sad, because even here on earth you will not find fullfillment.

What does this have to do with morality?
I think it is a legitimate question. According to Christian doctrine you are going to spend eternity in heaven if you were a good guy. But what are you doing there all this time so you're not feeling bored?

423 posted on 05/21/2002 10:00:43 AM PDT by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Calling evolutionary biology religion well, is a bit ridiculous. It broadens the definition of religion. What then is religion? Science has to do with the physical happenings in the world where religion has to do with faith. Science is based in observation, acquired knowledge that can be tested.

Gould's theory of punctuated equilibrium is an elaboration, refinement on Darwin's theory. I like how Michael Shermer put it "[Punctuated Equilibrium] no more proves Darwin wrong than Einsteinian relativity proves Newton wrong."

424 posted on 05/21/2002 10:01:16 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
So now the comaparison is the solemn word of God to Hitler's reign of terror in Nazi Germany.

Speaks volumes about the person saying it..

425 posted on 05/21/2002 10:02:31 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
If there is no sin and no need for Christ, why do catholics go to confession every Sunday? Inquiring minds want to know.

Some people NEED to believe. --Some don't.
If you really had an inquiring mind, this truth would be self evident.
389 posted by tpaine

Obviously, you don't know a rhetorical question when you see one,

Obviously, you got an unrefutable answer to your question, so now you claim it was 'rhetorical'. Petty dissembling.

but coming from someone who identifies himself with a famous God-hater, I am not surprised.

Tom Paine didn't hate the idea of god, or the men that believed in one.
He exposed hypocrites, exactly like you.

426 posted on 05/21/2002 10:03:07 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
A true 'inquiring mind' is open to all possibilities..
427 posted on 05/21/2002 10:06:28 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
Who comes up with what's moral? Whoever has the most power? In a democracy the people...in a dictatorship, the dictator. Scary, but unfortunately true.
428 posted on 05/21/2002 10:10:50 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
What does having an inquiring mind have to do with being a good Christian?
That is awfully persumptious..

Hey, if you want to tar yourself as having an un-inquiring mind, be my guest.

Amusing concept, - "I'm a dolt, and proud of it!"

429 posted on 05/21/2002 10:12:44 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: Mortin Sult
Here is a link to a page that has other paleotologist's critiques of Gould's essays.
430 posted on 05/21/2002 10:23:02 AM PDT by Gladwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Absolutely. -- I read the new 'intelligent design' theories now and then, and reject them as just being a more sophisticated form of the same old dogma.

You guys seem to believe that your beliefs alter reality. --- I don't. -- 2+2 = 4, regardless of what I personally believe.

431 posted on 05/21/2002 10:24:57 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Who comes up with what's moral? Whoever has the most power? In a democracy the people...in a dictatorship, the dictator. Scary, but unfortunately true.

428 posted on 5/21/02 10:10 AM Pacific by JediGirl

Doesn't knowledge--science create LAW...'morality'?

432 posted on 05/21/2002 10:27:09 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: rpage3
Was Gould a vegetarian? I notice a lot of the cancer deaths around my area are people who are vegetarians or are on low fat diets.
433 posted on 05/21/2002 10:29:23 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Survival and propogation. Everything comes down to this.

That is still ad hoc. How is the "survival" of the group determined? How is the group "propagated"?

434 posted on 05/21/2002 10:29:57 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
inimical concepts.

How long have you been dead---heartbroken?

435 posted on 05/21/2002 10:35:04 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Is that why Paine was ostracized by the rest of the founders? Obviously, they were offended by his decidedly anti-christian stance.

And anyone familiar with the English language can clearly see that my question to catholics was rhetorical....except you.

And the word is not "unrefutable" but "irrefutable." You are all bluff but no substance.

436 posted on 05/21/2002 10:36:07 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Who comes up with what's moral? Whoever has the most power? In a democracy the people...in a dictatorship, the dictator. Scary, but unfortunately true.

Is that how you perceive the world? Sad. Clearly, "might makes right" does not work because it makes no distinction between power and goodness. Do you make a distinction between the two?

437 posted on 05/21/2002 10:37:20 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
But what are you doing there all this time so you're not feeling bored?

Everything good to my heart's content.

438 posted on 05/21/2002 10:37:48 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Wouldn't that depend upon the group? Survival takes many forms, not just keeping its members alive. Christianity, as a group, survived by becoming the state religion of Rome. Propogation is also more than just simply having children. It also involves recruiting. Christianity adopted many of the trappings of contemporary pagan religions in order to win converts (Sunday worship comes to mind).
439 posted on 05/21/2002 10:37:49 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I was actually stating the opposite.
440 posted on 05/21/2002 10:39:49 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 961-966 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson