Posted on 05/19/2002 10:17:53 PM PDT by kattracks
ASHINGTON, May 19 Vice President Dick Cheney said today that he considered another major attack by Al Qaeda against the United States to be "almost certain."
Mr. Cheney and Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, said in separate appearances on television news programs that they had no specific information about the expected timing or location of any attacks. But they added that worldwide surveillance of Al Qaeda messages and other intelligence confirmed the terrorist network's continued interest in attacking American targets.
The confirmation by senior administration officials of continuing threats against targets here comes as Congress is debating how to investigate the handling of similar intelligence before Sept. 11.
Representative Richard A. Gephardt, the House minority leader, appeared today to soften his earlier insistence that there be an independent investigation, separate from the joint inquiry by the House and Senate intelligence committees. "I think the investigation that's going on is a good one," he said on "Fox News Sunday." He added: "We might want to look at adding to that an investigation that includes outsiders so that we can get this information out sooner." When pressed on whether he wanted public hearings, he said, "I'm not sure you need public hearings."
In his appearances, Mr. Cheney ruled out releasing the full text of a report from a Federal Bureau of Investigation field office in Phoenix warning that Al Qaeda operatives were training at flight schools in the United States. He added, however, that the document was "fair game" for a Congressional committee that would keep it secret.
He also said a decision by President Saddam Hussein of Iraq to allow international weapons inspectors back into Iraq would not satisfy United States concerns about Baghdad's development of weapons of mass destruction.
On the NBC program "Meet the Press," Mr. Cheney said that "the prospects of a future attack against the United States are almost certain."
"We don't know if it's going to be tomorrow or next week or next year," he continued. "But the prospect of another attack against the United States is very, very real." He said it was "just as real, in my opinion, as it was Sept. 12."
Mr. Cheney did not portray the information as new but said it was "a reminder that we're still very heavily engaged in this war on terror." He used similar language on "Fox News Sunday."
Ms. Rice, appearing on the CBS program "Face the Nation," said the volume of such reports might have grown, but that was largely because United States and foreign intelligence agencies had heightened mobilization and cooperation since Sept. 11.
Given the tougher security precautions initiated since September at airports and other ports of entry, Ms. Rice said, there was no need to ratchet up security measures in response to any recent threats.
"This is not a new set of warnings," she said. She added that from time to time, the amount of information "will spike," but the crucial question is whether it offers specific details that can be used to prevent an attack, like location, date or method.
In deflecting criticism of the handling of intelligence reports before Sept. 11, Ms. Rice emphasized that no specific information in any impending attack was discovered.
She also said: "I do not believe that we can have assurance that we're going to prevent another attack. We are doing what we can inside the country to disrupt them. We're doing what we can to harden the country. But the most important thing that we're doing, and it's what we need to stay focused on, is fighting this war to try to get them at their source."
Asked whether the administration had decided to disclose its concerns over another attack to deflect criticism over Sept. 11, Ms. Rice answered, "We don't play games with this."
May we scrutinize people from the Middle East?
Examine their Hard Drives tap their phones?
Slow their migration to the US?
Battle them on their own turf in far away foreign countries? P>After all the dems allowed 3,000 people to die in the WTC so as not appear as war mongering in order to retain the White House.
See-
"Why Clinton failed to stop bin Laden President's actions ineffectual against terrorists, critics say " in USA Today By Susan Page w*w.usatoday.com/usatonline/20011112/3615321s.htm "The domestic political situation was complicated. The Cole attack came in the final weeks of a close presidential campaign; some Clinton advisers worried that military strikes would be seen as a ploy to boost Gore, the Democratic nominee. Then the election wouldn't end: The Florida recount stretched for another 5 weeks.
The Liberals sacrificed the lives of 3,000 Americans in order to help Gore win the election.
bin Laden is said to have been startled that the degree of retaliation that was foisted upon him as a result of the 9/11 attacks. But, he won't make that mistake again. No, the next attaclk will most likely be aimed at Joe Six-pack Everyman. al-Queda will want to send the message that they can hit anywhere, anytime. They (al-Queda) probably noted the financial hit that the economy took as a result of the WTC/Pentagon hits. Those were largely symbolic attacks on the financial heart of America and the military (I still think the actual target was the White House).
Now, the common American is most likely the target. I have heard that October is a potential date, I have recently heard about apartments as potential targets. I would invite your imagination to visualize a scene where 1 or maybe 2 high-rise condo/apartment buildings simultaneously are felled in multiple cities across the US. I say this because I am currently in Honolulu. Here, there are many high rises that are all nearly full to capacity. coupled to that, in many cases the building "super" is either a middle eastern guy or Indonesian. This is not new. Historically, middle easterners find themselves as the "super" because they are cheap labor for the building owners. Statisitcally, the chances that a subset of these individuals being sympathetic to the al-Queda cause is extremely high. This places them into an ideal position to be in the right place at the right time and bango buildings come tumbling down.
Just another thing to think about....
Semper Fi
Al Queda has bombed buildings before: the barracks in Saudi Arabia, and the embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam.
Plus, the Chechens would like to get in their licks, since we have aligned with Russia against them.
They may have taught some tricks to sleeper agents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.