Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HDawg
While I cannot argue the merits of whether THC levels have increased since the 60's or 70's, I would argue that todays' pot is not any better than yesterdays' pot.
Fact is, my observances are that todays' pot sucks.
I haven't had a good high since 1981, and the ocassional hits I have had since that time were useless.
People tell me they have this really great shit, try it, they paid $125 for 1/4 oz., and it does nothing.

We used to go out and harvest our own, in Kentucky and Missouri, and a couple of hits would give you halucigenetic flashes.
It's been 20 years now, and I have seen nothing like that, and besides, it's way too expensive.
Supposed THC levels aside, today's stuff wouldn't get a fly high.

26 posted on 05/19/2002 10:58:06 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Drammach
Supposed THC levels aside, today's stuff wouldn't get a fly high.

Today's pot, mostly grown in the Carolinas, from what I have heard, could make a cup of coffee nervous. It's often a jittery, somewhat uncomfortable high. No comparison to the Panama Red, and the Acapulco Gold, and the Lebanese hash, and the good ole fashioned Thai stick we grew up with in the late '60s early '70s. Of course, I gave it up long ago, but this is what I hear.

31 posted on 05/20/2002 12:13:57 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson