Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
If they were not, then they weren't bound by any decisions made in Washington. I don't see any other choices.

They thought they were out of the Union. That seems sufficient to me to say that the loyal members could seat whomever they wanted.

Also, Stainless was trying to play fast and loose with the facts. He was in such a big hurry to slam the Congress he forgot that he had in the past stated MOST emphatically that the so-called seceded states were in fact out of the Union.

Walt

56 posted on 05/20/2002 12:01:08 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
OK, let's break it down further. You said, "They thought they were out of the Union." Well, were they or weren't they, in your view?
58 posted on 05/20/2002 12:08:08 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
Also, Stainless was trying to play fast and loose with the facts. He was in such a big hurry to slam the Congress he forgot that he had in the past stated MOST emphatically that the so-called seceded states were in fact out of the Union.

It is not inconsistent to say both (1) that courts should have held that states have the legal right to secede, and (2) that, under the law as our courts have decided it, states do not have the right to secede and are not extinguished as entities by an attempt at secession. As a matter of fact, I believe both of those propositions myself.

60 posted on 05/20/2002 12:09:23 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson