If you feel she and her daughter should be kicked out of the church because this woman failed to tell the church about her employment or that she be booted because she is a "risk taker," then you have illustrated my point quite well.
You and I simply disagree on the function of the church.
Here's what I said: "She clearly understood that her choice was conflictive, but she's an EXHIBITIONIST,-- and risk-takers, by nature, enjoy a game of truth or consequences.
She was kicked out of the school-- she lied, she knew she lied, she preferred the lie, it was thrilling to lie, it was rewarding to lie, it was all about the lie, and never about the truth, until she was forced to admit it. Now there are consequences-- how does this illusrate your point, if I make a point that you disagree with?