To: JohnPaulJones
My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish??? Manssor was telling Rangle about how he had worked with the present administration as much as the previous and I 'think' he was going to say something negative about the Clinton administration, when Hannity stopped him to 'move on'. Argh!
To: ET(end tyranny)
Rangle was clearly getting a little nervous about Mansoor facts and commnets...They clearly are going after GWB.....
To: ET(end tyranny)
My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish??? My question too! I think he was going to say something important, and he was cut off! Hannity needs to develop his listening skills, IMO.
6 posted on
05/17/2002 6:23:34 PM PDT by
ohioWfan
To: ET(end tyranny)
My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish??? I know, I wanted to hear much more of what Mansoor Ijaz had to say. Rangel and Hannity cut him off. I didn't understand what all the laughing was about during this segment either, it was hardly a funny subject.
22 posted on
05/17/2002 7:19:04 PM PDT by
nutmeg
To: ET(end tyranny)
My first comment is why didn't Hannity let Manssor finish??? yeah I was wondering that also...He was about to slam Clintion in comparision to Bush ...I just think Sean just missed it...
34 posted on
05/17/2002 7:41:54 PM PDT by
alphadog
To: ET(end tyranny)
Because Hannity thinks the show is all about HIM!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson