Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Starmaker
Apparently the FDA is content to approve worthless drugs based on the results of two statistically irrelevant tests regardless of the fact that the drugs have failed an exponentially greater number of tests

Better that then having the FDA be so strict that it blocks drugs that do work, or increases the costs of approval that experimental new drugs never make it to the design phase.

2 posted on 05/17/2002 4:57:18 PM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King
Imagine the upheaval such a dramatic finding would cause in any other line of business.
Well, they are a bit generous to other lines of business. Management consulting is chock full of charlatans, and global warming is an obvious fraud if you consider the fact that geological and cosmological influences on climate and several orders of magnitude larger than anything you could do with SUVs. But still, isn't the FDA supposed to judge on the basis of safe AND effective? Who OK'ed this crap?
4 posted on 05/17/2002 5:06:02 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson