Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
And in 1998, Time Magazine narrowed the targets to DC and New York. How much more information did this administration think was necessary before it acted?

And what, exactly, could they have added to the article that was PUBLISHED IN 1998??? That Islamic terrorists might hijack planes? That's like saying a bear might sh_t in the woods. That NY and DC were targets? According to you, we've known that since at least 1998!

Sheesh.

15 posted on 05/17/2002 2:16:05 PM PDT by mondonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: mondonico
bump for later
16 posted on 05/17/2002 2:17:00 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: mondonico
And what, exactly, could they have added to the article that was PUBLISHED IN 1998???

It wasn't just an article. The article's information was gleaned from the statements of US intelligence officers and officials. What do you think the Bush administration (and the Clinton administration for that matter) might have done to prevent hijackings?

36 posted on 05/17/2002 4:23:57 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: mondonico
Psssst...
I heard they might use a "suitcase nuke". If they do, can we say that we were warned.

New Top Secret US Defense Plan:


1. Make a list of all the possible weapons that terrorists could use
2. Make a list of all the cities they could attack.
3. Get a calendar and make a list of all the days they could attack.
4. Prevent them all. (but you can only spend what the Dems will allow after paying for their stupid crap)

OK, go to it... we can now disband the CIA.

41 posted on 05/17/2002 5:08:42 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson