To: Demidog
And in 1998, Time Magazine narrowed the targets to DC and New York. How much more information did this administration think was necessary before it acted?And what, exactly, could they have added to the article that was PUBLISHED IN 1998??? That Islamic terrorists might hijack planes? That's like saying a bear might sh_t in the woods. That NY and DC were targets? According to you, we've known that since at least 1998!
Sheesh.
To: mondonico
bump for later
16 posted on
05/17/2002 2:17:00 PM PDT by
aShepard
To: mondonico
And what, exactly, could they have added to the article that was PUBLISHED IN 1998??? It wasn't just an article. The article's information was gleaned from the statements of US intelligence officers and officials. What do you think the Bush administration (and the Clinton administration for that matter) might have done to prevent hijackings?
36 posted on
05/17/2002 4:23:57 PM PDT by
Demidog
To: mondonico
Psssst...
I heard they might use a "suitcase nuke". If they do, can we say that we were warned.
New Top Secret US Defense Plan:
1. Make a list of all the possible weapons that terrorists could use
2. Make a list of all the cities they could attack.
3. Get a calendar and make a list of all the days they could attack.
4. Prevent them all. (but you can only spend what the Dems will allow after paying for their stupid crap)
OK, go to it... we can now disband the CIA.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson