Posted on 05/16/2002 1:28:12 PM PDT by finnman69
Poll: Bush Ratings Still High
NEW YORK, May 15, 2002
Americans continue to give President Bush high ratings, both overall and for his handling of events in the Middle East, even though most believe he does not have a clear plan for his policy there but is reacting to events as they occur. The public continues to sympathize more with Israel in the conflict, but doubts either side wants peace, and is divided on what the U.S. can and should do.
The Bush Administration's lack of attention to the Middle East prior to the outbreak of fighting last month may have led people to believe the conflict caught the Administration without a clear strategy for the region. Two-thirds of the public think Bush is reacting to events there as they occur. 26% think Bush has a clear plan for dealing with the area.
Bush's Policy In Middle East
Clear plan 26%
Reacting to events 65%
Nevertheless, the perceived lack of a clear Middle East strategy has not hurt evaluations of Bush's handling of the situation between Israel and the Palestinians. 58% approve of his handling of the conflict, and 27% disapprove.
Bush's Handling Of Middle East Conflict
Approve 58%
Disapprove 27%
What Can Be Done?
As has been the case since the fighting began last month, Americans are divided on what the U.S. role in resolving the conflict should be. 43% think the U.S. has a responsibility to try to resolve the fighting there, but 47%, think the U.S. does not.
Does U.S. Have Responsibility In Middle East?
Yes 43%
No 47%
48% think establishing peace in the Middle East is something the American government cannot do anything about.
39% think the U.S. should publicly support Israel. However, nearly as many Americans think the U.S. should say nothing to Israel.
Americans continue to be more critical of Yasser Arafat; 33% now think the U.S. should publicly criticize the Palestinian leader. Still, slightly more -- 40% -- think the U.S. should say nothing to him.
WHAT POSITION SHOULD THE U.S. TAKE WITH...
Publicly support Israel 39% Arafat 11%
Publicly criticize Israel 11% Arafat 33%
Say nothing Israel 34% Arafat 40%
The public thinks the conflict in the Middle East is at an impasse, with neither side willing to make concessions in order to obtain peace. While the Israeli government is viewed as more willing than Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to make concessions for peace, the percentage who think Israel is not willing to do so outnumbers the percentage who think it is willing to compromise.
Do They Want Peace Enough To Make Concessions?
Israeli Government
Yes 33%
No 53%
Arafat
Yes 11%
No 79%
One probable reason for the harsh views of Arafat is that nearly all Americans think Arafat is not doing his part to stop the suicide bombings committed by Palestinians against Israelis. While 59% think Arafat is unable to completely control the actions of Palestinians, 88% think he could do more to stop the bombings.
The public continues to side with the Israelis in this conflict. 47% support Israel, and 17% support the Palestinians.
Who Do You Sympathize With More?
Israel 47%
Palestinians 17%
Neither 14%
39% support the establishment of a Palestinian homeland in the West Bank and Gaza strip, and 30% oppose it.
Establishing Palestinian Homeland
Favor 39%
Oppose 30%
The War In Afghanistan
The public is less optimistic about America's other major foreign involvement right now, the war in Afghanistan. Capturing Osama bin Laden is seen as a prerequisite to winning the war, and decreasing numbers think that war is going well.
Most Americans (81%) think Osama bin Laden is still alive, and a growing number believe the U.S. will not have won the war in Afghanistan unless he is captured or killed. Now, 67% think the U.S. won't win without finding bin Laden, up from 59% in February. 23% think the U.S. will have won without capturing or killing bin Laden, down from 32% in February.
Can U.S. Win War Without Capturing Or Killing Bin Laden?
2/02
Yes 32%
No 59%
That may be the reason why a decreasing majority of Americans think the war there is going well for the U.S. 73% now say it is going very or somewhat well; in January, 89% felt that way. The number who think the war is going very well is less than half of what it was in January.
HOW IS WAR IN AFGHANISTAN GOING FOR U.S.?
Now
Very well 18%
Somewhat well 55%
Very/somewhat badly 20%
72% think it is likely that the fighting in Afghanistan will spread to a larger war between Western countries and Muslim countries. That view has been consistent since last December.
Concern about another terrorist attack has also changed little since December; 72% now think it is very or somewhat likely there will be another terrorist attack in the next few months; 25% think that is very likely. 56% think international terrorism is the more serious threat to Americans, while 30% think domestic terrorism is more serious.
The Economy
Although terrorism still tops the list of problems the public wants the President and Congress to address, the economy and jobs ranks second, cited by 15%. Far fewer mention other domestic issues such as education, Social Security or taxes.
Most Important Problem
Terrorism, war 23%
Economy, jobs 15%
Education 5%
Social Security 4%
Taxes 4%
There are some signs that the public perceives the economy as improving. 66% of Americans rate the economy as good now, and 34% think it is bad. In February, 53% thought it was good, and 45% thought it was bad. But the real optimism lies in Americans' views of the near future; 31% think the economy is getting better, up from 18% in January.
Economy Is Getting:
Better 31%
Worse 18%
Same 51%
1/02
Better 18%
Worse 33
Same 48
But views of the President, the economy, and developments overseas aren't providing much guidance right now on what the central issues will be in the upcoming midterm elections. Among registered voters, 40% say they plan to vote for the Republican candidate in their district this fall, and 40% plan to vote for the Democrat.
The President
As with evaluations of his handling of the Middle East, other aspects of Bush's presidency have remained stable in the past month. 80% approve of his handling of the campaign against terrorism, 77% approve of his overall job performance, and 63% approve of the way Bush is handling foreign policy. The one negative note for Bush is the evaluation of his handling of the economy. Far fewer -- 52% -- approve of Bush's handling of the economy, and that number has dropped steadily since last fall.
BUSH'S APPROVAL RATINGS
Now
Handling campaign against terrorism 80%
Now Overall 77%
Now
Handling foreign policy 63%
62%
Now
Handling the economy 52%
The Trade Embargo Against Cuba
While the Bush opposes ending the trade embargo against Cuba, the American public is split on the issue. Now, 46% think the U.S. government should continue the trade embargo that it imposed years ago, however, almost as many - 44% - think the trade embargo should end.
SHOULD U.S. CONTINUE TRADE EMBARGO AGAINST CUBA?
Now 1/98 10/96 9/94
Yes 46% 46% 56% 51%
Now 1/98 10/96 9/94
No 44% 44% 32% 42%
But back in 1996, more than half of Americans favored continuing the trade embargo against Cuba. Early that year, Cuban MiGs shot down two small American civilian planes operated by a Cuban-American group that were flying north of Cuba. In 1998, the number supporting an end to the embargo increased; perhaps due to Pope John Paul the Second's historic visit to Cuba. The Pope opposes the trade embargo against Cuba.
There are party differences when it comes to trade policy in Cuba. 57% of Republicans would like the trade embargo against Cuba to continue, while 52% of Democrats think the embargo should end.
This poll was conducted among a nationwide random sample of 647 adults, interviewed by telephone May 13-14, 2002. The error due to sampling could be plus or minus four percentage points for results based on the entire sample.
Wow you Randians really think you know everything don't you. Since you are so sure about the President's upcoming nosedive in the polls, could you give me a stock tip so that I can make a million dollars.
a.cricket
A fact which the lamestream media will be whoring all day long. Then, we have to listen to liberal windbags talk about how W is stupid and evil and tool of the special intersts...BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH...
I CAN'T STAND TO LISTEN TO THESE IDIOTS ANYMORE!
If I have to listen to Paul Begala (and his fake Texas accent...only on certain words) or any other talking head launch into a diatribe about "Bush knew about the hijackings", trying to assert it as THE hijackings (as in the ones that resulted in 9/11), as opposed to "hijackings" (in the general sense), I AM GOING TO PUKE!
IN your frightful dreams.
One of the most stupid things a political opponent can do is paint someone who is not a failure as a failure and let the public figure that out.
The media and their lackeys the Democrats, painted Bush as a very dumb rich kid whose dad and mom made life easy fo him. They said could not do anything well and would fail at everthing soon.
The media and their Democrat lackeys said that Bush was wrong about the economy needing stimulus. The economy was strong and growing stronger they said before the 2000 election. They said we did not need Bush's economic plan becuase the economy was just fine. Nearly everyone believed the media until they got their pink slip.... Then it occured to a number of the pink slip holders that Bush was right and the media was wrong.
Then they said bush's plans for the Taliban would only lead to a Viet Nam type Quagmire. Tens of thousands of troops would die in an attempt to do what the Russians at their splendid peak had failed to do in Afghanistan Once again the media and their Democrat lackeys were proved wrong.
They finally passed Bush's stimulus package lite, but claimed it was not needed and the economy was going to do just fine with out it. Wrong again. What they have proved is that they are wrong on every count and Bush was right on every count. The first 3 or 4 times you accuse someone of being wrong, only to find out he was right, the public beleives you. But about the 5th or 6th time it begins to sink in .. don't believe anthing the media says about that person. It in effect coats that person with Teflon.
The Media and their lackies in the Democratic party did the same thing 20 years ago. They painted Ronald Reagan as a bumbling fool for all of 1980, 81 and 82. But it turned out every thing Reagan said was true and everything the media and their lackeys the Democrats said were untrue. The media spent the next six years tyring to destory Reagan in the eyes of the people. They failed.
The media admitted failure. They started calling Reagan the TEFLON president. Even when Reagan did negative things the public would no longer believe what the media said about him.
That is the problem the media has created again. Their lying attacks have been proved wrong so often that they have in effect painted Bush with Teflon.
Fools like you and the media never figure it out. But Bush is now a Teflon President too;. The more you attack d the less credibility you have.
Tom Daschle may eventually figure it out. Daschle takes very hard swings at Bush. His fist feels crunched flesh and warm blood. He is sure he has hurt bush baddly. Daschle looks only to find that bush shows no signs of being hit. There is not a mark on him. Then Daschle looks in the mirror and finds his own nose bleeding and he has a black eye. That is the problem with teflon presidents, when you swing at them all you hit is you.
No one ever accused the media and its Democrat lackies of being quick learners. NO one ever will.
"But, but , but Star Wars will create a new arms race!!!!!".
Nice. Bush proved em wrong again with a new arms reductions treaty AND SDI moving forward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.