Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ONLY A THIRD PARTY, COMMUCRATS WOULD FEAR THE PICTURE OF PRES. BUSH
PERSONAL OPINION | 9/16/02 | REBA

Posted on 05/16/2002 8:09:54 AM PDT by rebapiper

A third party, the Commurats would fear a picture of a brave President that was able to take control and bring this country together. A Picture is like a thousand words, a picture that will be a constant reminder to the American people, a reminder of 9/11, a reminder of good and evil, a new Presidant that took office to only find out that the former evil tyrant that was in office opened the doors and our boarders to terrorists, a reminder of what communist is all about. A picture that will only prove that a the communist party has been running our country, a third party, the commucrats that don't want to reveal themselves, a third party that wanted to bring this great country to it's knees.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: commucrats
The Commucrats fear the picture of Pres.Bush. The Clintons and their Commucratic party set the course for the hyjackers that flew the planes into the buildings. The Commucratic party get what they want, Mama terrorist Hillary was raising money from terrorist groups during her campaign. IT WOULD BE AN HONOR FOR EVERY AMERICAN TO GET A COPY OF THE PICTURE OF PRES.BUSH. A PICTURE THAT WE COULD GIVE TO OUR CHILDREN AND TO KEEP AS A CONSTANT REMINDER OF A GREAT PRESIDENT. HOLDING THE PICTURE OF PRES.BUSH IN FRONT OF THE COMMUCRATIC PARTY IS LIKE HOLDING A CROSS IN FRONT OF THE DEVIL.
1 posted on 05/16/2002 8:09:55 AM PDT by rebapiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rebapiper
Sorry reba, but I will not support a president who is intent on flooding us with illegal aliens, not to mention that, despite the war effort, the federal government is growing as large as ever.

I don't think that President Bush is a good president, for he's not supporting what the people want (illegal immigration stopped, less government, etc.), but rather what the elites want. Bush is bent on erasing our border, and I think that his actions clearly prove this.

Tom Tancredo should make a run at president. At least we'd have a freedom-loving, America-First individual in the White House.

2 posted on 05/16/2002 10:22:16 AM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
I don't think that President Bush is a good president, for he's not supporting what the people want (illegal immigration stopped, less government, etc.), but rather what the elites want. Bush is bent on erasing our border, and I think that his actions clearly prove this.

Huh I guess Bush taking the US out of the International UN court is a death knell to American soverignty.

Your reply is a perfect example of knee jerkism. Face it we have a 2,000 mile border with Mexico and Bush is saying greater economic trade will benefit both countries, but that does not matter to you because you from your posts seem to have a visceral hatred of Mexicans. There is nothing new to this in American history, there has always been a current of immigrant bashing since the founding of the country.

3 posted on 05/16/2002 10:30:59 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Dane, apparently you don't understand the whole story, and you're throwing out the race card again. That means you have zero logic to your point, and you've reverted to this last tactic.

Typical.

4 posted on 05/16/2002 10:36:30 AM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Or should I call you VA Advogado.
5 posted on 05/16/2002 10:37:07 AM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Two steps back, one forward. It's incrementalism.
6 posted on 05/16/2002 10:38:24 AM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
Dane, apparently you don't understand the whole story, and you're throwing out the race card again. That means you have zero logic to your point, and you've reverted to this last tactic.

Uh it seems that you are the one doesn't understand the whole story. You were the one who convienently left out Bush unsigning Clinton's signature on the Internatioanl UN Court, to make your "point" that Bush doens't care about American sovereignty.

Oh well anyway you can keep going on your, IMO, paranoid anti-Mexican rants, while you leave out facts.

7 posted on 05/16/2002 10:41:51 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rebapiper
I think it's dangerous to engage in idol-worship.
8 posted on 05/16/2002 10:42:25 AM PDT by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rebapiper
Since the picture is federal property, any and every political organization should have a right to use prints of it for whatever purposes they wish. The problem here is that we're paying for someone to run around taking vanity shots of the President of the first place. Let him take out his checkbook and go over to Galmour Shots on his own dime.
9 posted on 05/16/2002 11:26:11 AM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson