Posted on 05/14/2002 12:38:00 PM PDT by Patriotman
Journalist battles war crimes summons
Randal, a journalist, refuses to be called as a witness
Journalists' lives could be put in danger if they are forced to give evidence in war crimes trials, a lawyer arguing against the summoning of an American reporter has told the Hague tribunal.
War correspondents who take the witness stand risk being perceived by potential sources as an investigative arm of a judicial system
Geoffrey Robertson Defence attorney Geoffrey Robertson was speaking at the start of an appeal by former Washington Post reporter Jonathan Randal, who has been subpoenaed to give evidence at the war crimes tribunal.
But the prosecution says journalists should not be given a blanket exemption from testifying.
The result of the appeal, brought by the Washington Post, could set a precedent for other war correspondents called upon to reveal their sources.
Public interest
Mr Robertson argued that testifying could also endanger the lives of a journalist's sources and would make news gathering more difficult in war zones.
"War correspondents who take the witness stand risk being perceived by potential sources as an investigative arm of a judicial system, government or private parties," he said.
Prosecutor Joanna Korner said it was in the public interest for Mr Randal to give evidence.
He had information which "goes to the heart of the case" of ethnic cleansing against two Bosnian Serbs accused of war crimes during the 1992-95 Bosnian conflict, she said.
Ms Korner said journalists could not be given a "blanket exemption" from testifying in court.
ICC precedent
In 1993, Jonathan Randal interviewed Radoslav Brdjanin, one of two Serb defendants on trial for genocide.
In his article, he quotes Mr Brdjanin, a housing administrator, defending ethnic cleansing of Muslims and Croats.
Mr Randal's British lawyer, Mark Stephens, says the judgment in this case will influence practice at the permanent International Criminal Court which is about to begin business.
The first chief UN war crimes prosecutor, Judge Richard Goldstone, has said that journalists should have legal protection from testifying in such cases.
And so it begins...
I think that these liberals assume that they'll have all the Constitutional protections they are used to under the UN. Think again. Such protections only get in the way of their social engineering and they have little use for them.
The U.N want to see what they can get away with. This is the first TesT for America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.