Skip to comments.
Why Russian Mafia Boss Still Allowed To Travel On Israeli Passport
www.topica.com ^
| May 6, 2002
| Gordon Thomas
Posted on 05/13/2002 7:10:49 PM PDT by Ivan the Terrible
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: veronica
You are not going to argue with the Pope are you? Of course. He no more special than Pat Roberston,or any of the other charlatans.
He often refers to Jews as 'the chosen people, His chosen people,' etc.
Don't you think that in the spirit of "oneness",he needs to stop lumping people in groups?
To: sneakypete
BTW,are you really desperate enough you are going to use the Pope to support your position? After all,what you are REALLY trying to say with this post is that YOU are not going to quit grouping YOUR "chosen people" together as "chosen people",but nobody else had a right to group together. What word is it you use to describe "non-Chosen People"? Is it "Goyem"?
To: mrustow
So, where does it say he's a Jew? On his Israeli passport. So, now the "world Zionist conspiracy" is running the world through organized crime?
Where did I say that,Buchwheat? The fact that these people are Jewish is incidental.
But I run the world Zionist conspiracy! You're telling me that I don't know how my own conspiracy works?!
That's right. Try to post some nonsense to divert attention,in the hope people will ignore what you ridicule.
How is it that anti-Semites always think they can make better Jewish jokes than Jews?
That's right Jesse,play the race card.
To: sneakypete
I wrote to Seti1:
David Duke had a peice run in the Arab Press recently. I'm sure you would like it.
Sneakypete responded
Sounds to me like you are a anti-Gentile. You should be ashamed of yourself,bigot.
Seti 1 was off on a rant about Jewish control of the country. I pointed out the similarities to David Duke.
I'm not sure what this has to do with being anti-gentile. However, I have found that those in the White Seperatist movements believe that any opposition is race treason. I hope your logic is not along those lines.
I am in no way anti-Christian.
64
posted on
05/20/2002 4:13:39 PM PDT
by
rmlew
To: sneakypete
I'm sorry that oppose bigots and appoligists for them hurts me in your eyes.
65
posted on
05/20/2002 4:15:07 PM PDT
by
rmlew
To: rmlew
I hope your logic is not along those lines. It's not.In fact,what I am protesting against is the hyprocisy expressed by some Jewish posters who only see bigotry when anybody says anything even remotly critical of any Jew,anywhere,at any time. LOTS of Re-verse bigotry going on out dare.
I am in no way anti-Christian.
I am anti-organized religion,but I am neither anti-Jewish or anti-Christian.In general, I object to the process,not the people.
To: rmlew
I'm sorry that oppose bigots and appoligists for them hurts me in your eyes. I'm not really sure what you were trying to say.
To: sneakypete
It's not.In fact,what I am protesting against is the hyprocisy expressed by some Jewish posters who only see bigotry when anybody says anything even remotly critical of any Jew,anywhere,at any time. LOTS of Re-verse bigotry going on out dare.
There is no such thing as "reverse racism". There is only racism. It doesn't matter who the target is. I don't accept PC language.
68
posted on
05/21/2002 9:10:11 AM PDT
by
rmlew
To: Vallandigham
Sorry, I never thought any Israeli Firsters would think of that title as a perjuritive. The way most of them have been screaming at OUR President for taking America's interests into consideration...such as not having the whole Middle East blow up in a religious war over land...Praising Israel/Likud/Sharon/Netanyahoo to the skies..
69
posted on
05/21/2002 8:10:19 PM PDT
by
meema
To: mrustow
I enjoyed reading many of the articles in both magazines for a long time. Now Bill and Rich, etc. sound like johnny one notes.
70
posted on
05/21/2002 8:14:10 PM PDT
by
meema
To: Seti 1
Thank you for printing out the proper definition for the 'un-informed' on this thread. After being away for a week, it's interesting to see all the nasties on the attack.
What does it mean 'NO personal attacks'?Does that not apply to ALL posters?
71
posted on
05/21/2002 8:29:54 PM PDT
by
meema
To: meema
I enjoyed reading many of the articles in both magazines for a long time. Now Bill and Rich, etc. sound like johnny one notes.Well, blow me away. I still read online articles from NR now and then, and on rare occasion, from the Standard. But I can't for the life of me see how anyone could ever have admired Bill Kristol (as a writer or editor) or Rich Lowry.
72
posted on
05/21/2002 10:30:27 PM PDT
by
mrustow
To: mrustow
Well, 'admired' is probably too strong a word. Let's put it this way: I found what they wrote interesting enough to read. I was a founding subscriber to the Standard. Still read some online of both mags. NR and WS
Cancelled Time, Newsweek and US News& World Report many years ago.
73
posted on
05/23/2002 8:55:03 PM PDT
by
meema
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson