[TLBSHOW]

Well there you have it. Rush and his reason for being upset with the President.

[Nogbad]

bump

[NAV1]

If he's disgruntled already, one can only wonder how he would feel after seeing this.. Pucker up Preztel boy, the big Mo (that's MOney) is in town...

[G Larry]

The President is not the Pope!

He is not obligated to toe the line on a constant set of invilable rules.!

It is OK for Bush to be pragmatic, especially if it's for the short term, in order to acheive a majority in the Senate.

If he currently had the majority in both houses do you really believe he would have;
Signed the Farm Bill, as written?
Signed the Bill imposing Steel tarrifs?
signed the Education Bill, as written?

[TransOxus]

The RINO White House has been marching to the liberal drummer after tossing a few peanuts in the guise of a tax-refund to Republicans. Everything since the tax-refund has been big liberal government which basically wipes out the peanuts tossed to the suckers. After 9-11, the country was ripe for Republican principles and leadership in that direction. All we got was mollycoddling of the real terrorist states responsible- Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The faggots and Clinton's directives and criminal actions are still around while no stand is taken against the moral corruption and depravities of the liberal agenda. The Senate was lost with a whimper but they cannot use this as an excuse as it now seems that pandering to Jeffords to keep him in the party would have been less harmful than completely selling out the the U.S. of A. to the liberal agenda under RINO leadership. Amazing that Clinton was kept in check by a Republican Congress but the RINOs are now doing more harm in less time than Slick spent at the kitchen sink.

[Bill Davis FR]

well, its 2002 and Bush is for more spending...he expands welfare spending for immigrants and for farmers...and byw he has taken us back in 100 billion dollar annual deficits again...can hardly wait for 2004...lol

[noah]

UNFORTUNATELY Bush is adopting the age old formula for getting reelected::::: ADOPT YOUR OPPONENTS PLATFORM!!!!! There is nothing new about this. This cuts your opponenents legs off at the knees and reassures your reelection. This is the most important thing to Bush. AFTER ALL WHAT GOOD CAN YOU DO if you don't get reelected.

[christine]

i agree with rush's disgruntlement (is that a word?) too!

[The Raven]

[ Don't blame me I voted for Forbes. ]

Actually, it seems the Pubs are afraid of responding to the Dems. Almost as if they've accepted status quo (big government).

Probably the polls are driving the leaders instead of visa versa

[Bob J]

On NOW at RadioFR!

6pm/9pm - Dr. Mike and "Faith in Action"! Tonight Dr. Mike celebrates the faithfulness of Yahweh's promise. "Who ever heard of such a thing? Before she travailed she gave birth" God's faithfulness is what we are praising tonight. We can surely count on all He has spoken.

7pm/10pm - The "Banana Republican", our own Luis Gonzalez, has a spirited interview with...none other than JACK THOMPSON!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep!

[dougherty]

They've said that Rush is a party hack, and that he'd support the Republican Party no matter what they did.

Even I have called him that before, on this very forum. I will admit it, I was wrong. I have a new respect for Rush.

[Red Jones]

Rush did show us that he's not Mr Republican as he has sometimes appeared to be in the past. That's good for Rush. It raises his stature. Thank god for limbaugh.

[Lightnin]

"Rush is disgruntled"

He's also becoming more and more irrelavant.

His stuff, which used to be fresh and provactive, has become nothing but a rehash of news and information that his staff gathers from the internet and other sources and simply recycles it.

I used to hate it when Rush took a day off; now I almost welcome it.

I think success has begun to spoil the great man.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

When Rush lost weight, his brain was the first hunk of fat to go.

[Aedammair]

"If the Reagan Revolution is not dead, then it's dying."

There was never any such thing; and that is Rush's first mistake. The idea that a sizeable part of the electorate was really behind the notion of a purely capitalist system is unbelievably naive. The electorate always wanted medicate, social security, etc. If there is any chance of establishing a truly conservative party and ideology it lies with future generations, not past or present ones.

Note to Rush: face the reality; the electorate is in favor of an eclectic form of rule; substanitally capitalistic but socialistic as well.

[Uncle Bill]

Bttt