Posted on 05/12/2002 1:06:40 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
Please explain how Bush supposedly "lied" about that. Did he not work with Congress? Were Senators forbidden White House access? What do you alledge?
Perhaps you simply don't know what a "liberal" looks like.
Liberals don't sign pro-firearms legislation that prevents bureaucrats from interfering with pilots carrying guns in the cockpits of their commercial aircraft, but Bush did.
Liberals don't enforce the Supreme Court's "Beck" decision (which permits union members to obtain full refunds of any part of their dues that are used for political purposes with which they disagree), but our current President did.
Liberals don't call our enemies "evil" and NAME the three most extreme enemies facing us, but President Bush did.
Liberals don't ignore cries from pacifists to not "bomb Afghanistan during Ramadan," but GWB did.
Liberals don't want to withdraw the U.S from the Soviet era ABM Treaty, but President Bush did it.
Liberals like the Kyoto Treaty on Global Warming, but Bush killed it.
Liberals like CO2 regulations for power plants, but GWB killed them.
Liberals like OSHA home-office ergonomic regulations, but Bush killed them, too.
Liberals don't get TWO tax cuts passed, either.
I do feel sorry for you. You apparently can't discern the difference between liberal and Conservative actions.
Sad.
And of course we all saw Al Gore's transcripts...Oh, I forgot
he flunked out of seminary after he bugged out of Vietnam.
Because, that is the sum total of his talking points. He will be faxed the next set soon.
I would rather be seen talking to a box of rocks.
Yeah.
So what does that tell you?
Irrefutable. Thank you.
Now, it's time to admit we were either mistaken, or misled. And invite everyone who tried to tell us the truth during the election campaign- the Brigadiers, the Libertarians- and were driven off this website by the mob, (including myself) to get back on to the Free Republic. We are going to need their help to get this president spurred into advancing the conservative agenda, and FR's the best place to start the snowball rolling.
There's some good stuff there Southack but it's not enough. Not enough, by a long shot.
Let me ask you something, as a fellow conservative; after eight years of Clinton, don't you hunger for this new president to advance the values we hold dear? Don't you want to see some real accomplishment on issues like guns, abortion, foreign aid, immigration, the UN, the growth of the State? And for that matter in bringing the Clintons and their cronies to justice? We have got to be ruthlessly honest with ourselves, stop the wishin' and hopin' and admit that President Bush is not about advancing the conservative agenda in any meaningful way. That's why these lib papers are going soft on him. When you are on our side of politics you should be making the right enemies. The Dem-controlled media should be screaming from the rooftops as Bush confronts their pet issues in word, and practise; not giving him gentle pats on the back, and acknowledging his poll figures. Hell, if he's got a 75% rating, why not trade some of that for the cause?
If he believes in the Cause.
God what tripe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.