Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio Wars - O'Reilly's Payola Strategy
PipeBombNews.com ^ | May 9, 2002 | William A. Mayer

Posted on 05/09/2002 2:32:26 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic

~ Radio Wars – O’Reilly’s Payola Strategy ~

By William A. Mayer - Editor & Publisher

May 9, 2002

Pompous loudmouth Bill O’Reilly has attempted to break into the radio spotlight with an all-out kamikaze blitz never before seen in talk radio.

The details, as so often happens these days, were broached by the “alternative” media, in this case the irrepressible, indefatigable Matt Drudge.

Drudge revealed that nearly $600,000 has curiously changed hands at precisely the time New York’s WOR and LA’s KABC made their decision to carry The Talk Factor.

This does not include the 200k that Drudge says was rejected in the DC market.

How much money, in totality, is being dangled about remains a mystery but there is too much smoke for this to be all bombast and mirrors – it has the ring of truth, in our opinion.

Enraged by the Drudge outing, O’Reilly went bonkers…ballistic…on the Imus show – calling Drudge a crack head and saying he [Drudge] should be killed.

O’Reilly, Mr. spin-free-zone, was spinning harder than James Carville, Paul Begalla and Bob Shrum combined, at a Grand Jury deposition.

We must assume that the former, Mr. Clean, doesn’t appreciate having his dirty clothes laundered in the same manner as that to which his guests have become accustomed.

Aside from the monetary implications – it has the nauseating appearance of payola to many - the choice of some of O’Reilly’s outlets are more than questionable.

Specifically, in the San Francisco market, attempting to counter conservative talk powerhouse, KSFO, O’Reilly’s syndicator WestWoodOne has placement with Susquehanna Media Co’s KTCT-AM, 1050 – The Ticket.

Suquehanna, blamed its 18 percent decrease in fourth-quarter revenues primarily on its San Francisco properties which, heretofore, have relied on the tried and true sports-talk format.

KTCT is at best a third tier operation that will be hard pressed to match the loyal audience either KSFO or KGO has amassed over the last few years – especially since KSFO carries Rush Limbaugh in the 9-12 PDT slot and follows with an hour of Shawn Hannity from 1-2 PM.

It remains a very unclear proposition whether KTCT can turn its operation around simply with a format change and entering the market in this manner is not an auspicious beginning for O’Reilly.

Imagine a young sportshead waking up on the morning of the changeover, expecting to hear a rough and tumble discussion of the previous night’s San Jose Sharks playoff game.

We are willing to bet it would be some variant of - “What the F$%k is this S$%t?”

What is the upshot?

There are several.that come to mind.

Fist there is the looney tunes aspect of O’Reilly’s seeming descent into madness on Imus. This is conduct bordering on the bizarre, especially for a graduate of the staid halls of Harvard., whose cool dissection of sandbagged guests is legendary. Such a reaction seems to lend considerable weight to the veracity of Drudges allegations – if not O’Reilly couldn’t have chosen a more damaging reaction.

Second there is the message of weakness that O’Reilly has sent to the market at precisely the wrong time. He has signaled that he can be rolled, that he is for sale and that he has already named his price – a figure that now will escalate.

Thirdly it shows a really seamy side of someone who has previously acted as a morally admirable paragon. Attempting to buy your way into the political talk show business, an industry created by one individual, from scratch, by Rush Limbaugh leaves a bad taste in ones mouth.

Why is that?

Well it has to do with a guy with vision and guts building an edifice by hand, one station at a time being challenged by a smug con artist who in the final analysis isn’t really even a moderate conservative, and who is now breaking arms like some morally dense palooka.

To say that we don’t have much respect for Bill O’Reilly and his hoodlum tactics is obvious, the question – the bottom line – is whether the repercussions will ripple or build into a tidal wave that will land him, hard, on a beach with lots of time for reflection of where it all went wrong.

You have left the no spin zone, its gone for good.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nospinzone; oreilly; payola; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Bill can't take the heat he dishes.
1 posted on 05/09/2002 2:32:26 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Geeezzz, just wait till his show actually airs.
2 posted on 05/09/2002 2:38:46 PM PDT by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
"Pompous loudmouth Bill O’Reilly..."

That's putting it mildly!

3 posted on 05/09/2002 2:40:10 PM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Warren
It has you mean you haven't heard it, neither have I.

No stations carry it around her.

4 posted on 05/09/2002 2:42:07 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
her=here
5 posted on 05/09/2002 2:42:29 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
See what happens, O'Reilly, when you go after the likes of Jessie HighJackson. These flamethrowers come atcha from every cesspool. Since you are referred to as a pompous, loudmouth needI say more about the agenda of the author. Go get them, Bill. There's always room in media for people exposing the plentiful crooks in the world.
6 posted on 05/09/2002 2:42:37 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
O'Reilly is not a conservative. He just got caught doing what he blasts liberals for doing.

Then, after being caught by Drudge, he acts like a liberal trained by Asp Carvile! Trying to dodge reality, he tries to spin his way out. He must feel like the Red Cross execs that he caught in big time lies/denials when they tried to play games with the 9/11 money sent to them!

He has done himself serious damage.

What was CBSVIACOM trying to do here? They are no friends of conservatives?

7 posted on 05/09/2002 2:43:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Sounds like a few more people are jealous of O'Reilly's success. This is not "payola." It's a normal process used when rolling out a new syndicated program.

As far as O'Reilly threatening Drudge, if you believe he was being anything but tongue in cheek, you've been watching too many Tom Clancy movies.

8 posted on 05/09/2002 2:44:07 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
I hear Ron Popeil and the Hairclub for Men guy broke into the world of entertainment this way.
9 posted on 05/09/2002 2:47:56 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
He has done himself serious damage.

How do you know? You don't strike me as an Imus listener. Did you hear the interview? Personally I discount half of what that muckracker Drudge says. He himself said he is happy if 50% of what he puts out is true.

What was CBSVIACOM trying to do here? They are no friends of conservatives?

They are providing entertainment. No one owes us a "Movement" program or mouthpiece. Radio is an ENTERTAINMENT vehicle. Its purpose is to make money while entertaining and informing its listeners. Its not to spout propaganda.

10 posted on 05/09/2002 2:50:21 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Has anyone else noticed this in their area, that about the time that the radio O'Reilly rumblings started the local channel that will carry O'Reilly started having a FoxNews feed for the news instead of CBS. I am wondering if this is some sort of thing with FoxNews and not O'Reilly. Maybe Fox is just trying to get everyone to stop having an ABC or CBS news feed. O'Reilly comes with the package, and even if O'Reilly fails, the stations get the FoxNews feed instead of the other networks. If that is the case, it looks kind of clever to me.

Just a thought...

11 posted on 05/09/2002 2:51:36 PM PDT by abner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
This is not syndication the way Rush, Savage, Hannity and the rest did it.

O'Reilly is just as the article states, "breaking arms like a morally dense palooka."

O'Reilly sound like Tip Oneill politically he aint no conservative.

12 posted on 05/09/2002 2:55:43 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead
Not to mention "30 minute abs" and the highly entertaining "30 minute heterosexual."
13 posted on 05/09/2002 2:57:04 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
S-A-V-A-G-E
14 posted on 05/09/2002 2:57:20 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abner
This is highly likely since Fox and Westwood are pushing the effort.

O'Reilly got caught and he is throwing an Irish fit.

15 posted on 05/09/2002 2:58:24 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Savage is nuts but I like him, I prefer my talk show hosts not to hide their mental illnesses.
16 posted on 05/09/2002 3:00:09 PM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
What a bunch of BULL CRAP.

If you have a local TV station and it is not owned by the network it carries, do you wonder why they carry the network shows and network commericals? It is real simple. The network pays them to carry their shows and commercials. NBC pays its affiliates. CBS pays it affiliates. ABC pays its affiliates. Fox pays its affiliates. In the old days you could own a TV station and make big bucks net profit on just the network's payments to you . You did not have to sell a single commercial to make money.

Does anyone with an IQ larger than 5 think stations carry IMUS because they like him and want to make IMUS rich?

Where do you think the stations get their money?

There are two deals. The first deal is the network pays the station to carry the show. I owned 3 radio stations. What do you think would happen if Matt Drudge came in asked me to carry his show? He says he would like 3 hours a day. I ask what is in it for me. He says, "Nothing! You get to pay your engineer, and rent, and electricity for the transmitter, and you air my show. I will sell the commercials and keep all the money."

How many stationt do you think he would get?

I would tell Drudge to get the hell out before I called the law to have him ejected. There are two ways to do a networked show. Rush does it by splitting the show's commerical time. He picks up the cost of doing the show and delivering it to the station. The station supplies the air time. Rush sells his half of the commercials and keeps the money for them. The station sells the other half of the commercials and keeps the money from them. In the other case the producer of the show just buys the time from the station. The producer expects to take in enough off the advertising the producer sells to pay the talent, pay the station while having a profit left over.

In both cases a new show will need some promotional advertising. The show producer may very well pick up the promotion cost. It is very common for the producer to agree to pay for the promotion. If the station is being paid a flat rate for broadcasting the show, the producer will always pay all the promotion costs.

There is absolutely nothing unusual about the O'Reily deal no matter if it is a straight purchase or co-op. Some producers do it one way in some markets and the other way in other markets. The deals are always negotiable.

There is nothing new different or strange about the O'Reily deal.

17 posted on 05/09/2002 3:02:03 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
a smug con artist who in the final analysis isn’t really even a moderate conservative

This is exactly how I feel about Bill O'Reilly. When I hear people complain about O'Reilly being a right-winger it makes me want to laugh. And then cry. O'Reilly is to the right of McCain on some issues but that is not saying much.

Luckily, talk radio lives off of CALLERS-- and O'Reilly's particular brand of logic will not be able to stand up to serious debate. It's the same problem all "holier-than-thou" feel-gooders have when confronted with facts. They start with bombasity, move to ad-hominum attacks, then whining to their imbecilic base. That's why there are NO serious Liberal talk shows, and that is why Mr. Bill will be short-lived. Drudge just gives him a scape-goat when he crashes and burns in the Arena of Ideas.

O'Reilly has been a great thing for FoxNews, so for that I thank him. But most of his ideas are "out there".

His positions that by happenstance end up Conservative are typically accidental and based on stupid reasons.

O'Reilly is the worst sort of populist. We should start keeping a scorecard and rating him-- Are you listening ACU? Maybe you should rate the Media as well as the politicians.

Pithy enough for y'all?

18 posted on 05/09/2002 3:07:03 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
I have a friend that owns a local station and they pay Rush to carry it.
19 posted on 05/09/2002 3:07:29 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
I don't watch O'Reilly. Nor am I jealous of his success. He has done some good things, but he is not a conservative.

If this is so normal re the payola, why aren't they saying so?

Of course this could be a pretend game between O'Reilly and Drudge to get people to listen to Bill.

Actually, I think that a cat fight between O'Reilly and Drudge would be great. They can each b$tch slap each other and sell tickets for the cat fight. They can give the money to a charity that they both like. Then, they can kiss and make up!

20 posted on 05/09/2002 3:08:07 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson