Skip to comments.
First Humans to Receive ID Chips
The LA Times ^
| May 9, 2002
| DAVID STREITFELD
Posted on 05/09/2002 1:29:44 PM PDT by tomball
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
This post is not a full text artical from the LA Times, and it is not posted with the intent to create a problem for Free Republic or its members. However, this artical is historic and important in content. The sole purpose of this post is to educate, and provoke thought to those who consider their right to privacy as sacred.
1
posted on
05/09/2002 1:29:45 PM PDT
by
tomball
To: tomball
very, very, very, very, very, very creepy.
To: tomball
able to receive GPS satellite signals and transmit a person's location.Just an idea ... voluntary for the general public, but manditory to convicted felons. Maybe a temporary version for those arrested, but our on bond? By the way, they may be implanted .... but how susceptable are they to damage from (intentionally applied) high magnetic fields? Can one burn one up (fry the circuitry), leaving an inert piece of silicon in the body?
3
posted on
05/09/2002 1:35:12 PM PDT
by
Hodar
To: tomball
Applied Digital, which says it has a waiting list of 4,000 to 5,000 people who want a VeriChip, plans to operate a "chipmobile" that visits Florida senior citizen's centers.Shades of the "combination guillotine/meter-maid cycle" from that old Jack Chick tract.
To: tomball
making them scannable just like a jar of peanut butter in the supermarket checkout line.What an analogy. Nothing like taking the humanity of a person away with one simple injection.
To: tomball
I'll never get one.
6
posted on
05/09/2002 1:41:51 PM PDT
by
aomagrat
To: tomball
It's an easier way to manage someone, like putting a leash on a pet.I stopped reading too soon. Perhaps someone's true intentions are showing here.
To: aomagrat
I'll never get one.And that certainly is your right. However, the idea of having a permanent form of ID on me is appealing. If I'm in an accident, my wife could be notified. My medical history would be instantly available, and my identity could not be stolen by some punk with my wallet.
8
posted on
05/09/2002 1:44:05 PM PDT
by
Hodar
To: DontMessWithMyCountry
isn't this from Reno's state of Florida
To: Republicus2001
hmmm, that's odd, I thought Jeb Bush was the governor of the state...
10
posted on
05/09/2002 1:49:51 PM PDT
by
dmz
To: boston_liberty
ping.
11
posted on
05/09/2002 1:55:35 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Hodar
dear komrade, we will of course be very very glad to implant you, thees way to the ovens, er a line, please. Are you out of your mind? the liberals are going to use this to track you....monitor you....CONTROL you...
To: Hodar
Be careful, you'll get fried here - as I did yesterday. Many of the folks at FR think the Verichip is the Mark of the Beast or somesuch, and will exercise mind control.
13
posted on
05/09/2002 1:58:27 PM PDT
by
Burn24
To: Capt.YankeeMike
dear komrade, we will of course be very very glad to implant you, thees way to the ovens, er a line, please. Are you out of your mind? the liberals are going to use this to track you....monitor you....CONTROL you...Exactly what do you base this on? They already have my fingerprints, my license info, my Social Security numbers, my car's license plate, my address, my financial numbers, my education, my place of work .... so how is having a chip inserted going to affect me? This is merely another way of identifying me, like a fingerprint or retnal scan.
14
posted on
05/09/2002 2:00:43 PM PDT
by
Hodar
To: Burn24
Not "mind control"; just plain ol' fascist control. In Biblical proportion.
15
posted on
05/09/2002 2:01:34 PM PDT
by
OKSooner
To: OKSooner
Not "mind control"; just plain ol' fascist control. In Biblical proportion.How? I have heard this emotional clap-trap over and over. Felons have their fingerprints, bio's, pictures, residences, and history all over the Fed's books .... that 'hardly' controls them, does it? HOW would merely having an ID chip allow anyone to control us? I'm hearing lots of mindless, fear-mongering assertations, but have not heard a SINGLE fact to support your side of the arguement.
16
posted on
05/09/2002 2:05:02 PM PDT
by
Hodar
To: Hodar
It's more of a Bible thing than a technology thing with them. Thus "Biblical proportions."
17
posted on
05/09/2002 2:07:38 PM PDT
by
Burn24
To: Burn24
It's more of a Bible thing than a technology thing with them. Really? This atheist doesn't think so highly of these chips either.
18
posted on
05/09/2002 2:11:43 PM PDT
by
freeeee
To: freeeee
Why? I have heard people fear them .... why? It's like Aboriginial tribesmen fearing having their picture taken (it robs them of their soul). I'm not saying anyone has to have a chip implanted .... just why this almost irrational fear of them.
19
posted on
05/09/2002 2:21:26 PM PDT
by
Hodar
To: Hodar
Why? I'm a strong believer in the slippery slope/incrementalism.
Just look at your own post #3:
"voluntary for the general public, but mandatory to convicted felons. Maybe a temporary version for those arrested, but our on bond?"
And old people with Alzheimer's. And little kids at the "Fingerprint your kid" program. And those in the military, and then people with just misdemeanors, and then anyone who is merely arrested, and then anyone who wants a job, or a bank account, or the "privilege" of driving.
Lately the only practical thing that preserves the little privacy and freedom we still have is the limits of technology. History is abundantly clear that each and every bit of technology will eventually be abused to its full potential. I'm through trusting them.
20
posted on
05/09/2002 2:35:55 PM PDT
by
freeeee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson