[nicollo]

I think I heard Rush apply the full logic of his "doctrine" today when he compared it to the use of nukes against Japan. I've been waiting for that one. I've heard the comparison before, but never so closely tied to his Isreal rants.

Ok. Kill 'em all. Then there can be peace.

The problem with the "Limbaugh Doctrine" is that there is no such thing as "victory" for the Isrealis outside of the extermination of its enemy's populations. Do we really want to go there, Rush? You proposed it, now drink your own brew. Nobody else will, including the Isrealis.

More importantly, as far as the U.S. cares about Isreal all of its enemies are not all our enemies.

Isreal has done everything it can short of a Hiroshima-type "final solution" (heh, he started the WWII metaphors). The reason it has not gone further is that it cannot. Total war against the Palestinians means total war against the Arabs. I don't see Isreal wanting that, which is why Isreali has not gone further than it already has, U.S. and/or international pressure not withstanding.

Limbaugh is in love with a theory. Sorry, babe, tastes good, but it don't rinse.

It's called hypocrisy. I'm dissapointed that he's taken the easy route.

[Libloather]

The problem with the "Limbaugh Doctrine" is that there is no such thing as "victory" for the Isrealis outside of the extermination of its enemy's populations.

How would YOU define victory? Maybe spelling Israelis correctly could be a start - eh?