Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longshadow
The result is an expression that looks like Heisenberg's original relation, but gives the exact uncertainty in the measurements of position and momentum.

Lemme see now ... I'm no QM man, but I guess this means that we used to be uncertain about how much uncertainty there was in such matters. Now we are less so. The article makes it sound as if we are far less so. This sounds like a significant improvement. But QM is definitely outside the range of my conversational topics.

16 posted on 05/07/2002 2:19:21 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
We used to know that we didn't know and we knew how much we didn't know. Now we know by how much we don't know that we don't know. Y'know.
17 posted on 05/07/2002 2:49:28 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
This sounds like a significant improvement. But QM is definitely outside the range of my conversational topics.

This is clearly a topic within the domain of "Plato the Platypus"....... [creating yet another posting opportunity for the jpg image of "Plato," the fuzzy, furry, and maniacal monotreme.]

19 posted on 05/07/2002 3:37:03 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson