Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Against Depression, a Sugar Pill Is Hard to Beat
Washington Post ^ | May 7, 2002 | Shankar Vedantam

Posted on 05/07/2002 8:48:34 AM PDT by liberallarry

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

After thousands of studies, hundreds of millions of prescriptions and tens of billions of dollars in sales, two things are certain about pills that treat depression: Antidepressants like Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft work. And so do sugar pills.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: depressions; placebos; quackcures
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last
To: Timesink
BTW, the study that started this entire thread only had seventeen people in it.

'Scuse me?  I don't think so.  Read the article again.  The study that was the basis of this article was the giant FDA database analysis done by Khan, Leventhal et al. 

"A new analysis has found that in the majority of trials conducted by drug companies in recent decades, sugar pills have done as well as -- or better than -- antidepressants. Companies have had to conduct numerous trials to get two that show a positive result, which is the Food and Drug Administration's minimum for approval. .
.
.
.
The average participant in an eight-week trial spends about 20 hours being examined by top experts and highly trained caregivers, said Seattle psychiatrist Arif Khan, who studied the placebo effect in trials submitted to the FDA."

The Lilly-funded Mayberg study that you're referring to is the small-scale neuroimaging study that was commented on later in the article.1

BTW, this FDA database analysis has been reported in at least 3 other places in some of the most respected journals in the field.2,3,4  It wasn't funded by the drug companies and analyzed the results of the entire FDA clinical trial database for antidepressants over a 12-year period, covering 45 phase II and phase III trials with 8,731 participants.  In addition to Dr. Khan, the other 4 people who worked on this came from such scientology hotbeds as Brown Univ., Duke Univ., and Tufts.

This rare glimpse at the FDA's own closely-kept clinical trial data is revealing in that, despite the best efforts of the researchers to put a happy face on it, the data speaks for itself.  Of the 8,731 participants in the various trials, 41% improved on new antidepressants (SSRIs), 42% improved on older antidepressants, and 31% improved on placebo.  What's remarkable about this is that despite the drug companies best efforts to screen subjects through carefully selected inclusion/exclusion criteria and use of dubious scientific techniques like placebo washout, (1) SSRIs were no better than older antidepressants, (2) the lowly placebo hung right in there and (3) 60%-70% of the subjects showed no significant improvement at all no matter what they were taking.  From these numbers one might be tempted to ask whether there even IS such a thing as an antidepressant.

The psych drug industry has a great gig going, but you need to be more careful with what you represent here.


1.  See my post #55 on this thread for a citation.

2.  Khan, A. et al., "Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials," Archives of General Psychiatry (April, 2000), 57:311.

3.  Bower, B., "Placebos for depression attract scrutiny," Science News (April 29, 2000), p. 278.

4.  Khan, A., Leventhal, R., et al., "Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Database," Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (May, 2002), 22(1): 40-45.

201 posted on 05/11/2002 7:18:44 PM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Thanks and FReegards.
202 posted on 05/12/2002 2:13:28 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: a history buff
If diethylstilbestrol (DES) can cause cancer in the granddaughters of those who took it, what will we see in the offspring of the Ritalin and Prozac kids?

Tell me, as someone who is greatly interested by the DES story, where I could read more about your claims.

Sorry for the slow reply. I'm not here, at this computer, weekends.

If you still want the article (it's about six pages) you'll have to do a search of "Science News-Modus Operandi of Diethylstilbestrol". For some reason I can't create a link. More information, about DES, can be found doing a search with "DES and Miscarriages" and "Diethylstilbestrol and cancer".

203 posted on 05/13/2002 12:43:14 PM PDT by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
First, most psychiatrists do little or no therapy. Second, any psychiatrist worth his salt can have a thriving practice in short order regardless of how many antidepressants are written by primary care physicians. You want to be the big cynic, you're going to need to know a little more about the real world and entertain a few less half-formed theories.

Since I have been the Medical Director of a 55 doctor group for over 6 years, I think I can speak with authority on the subject. What makes you so erudite on this topic?

204 posted on 05/13/2002 8:56:28 PM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: no one in particular
Just a thought: Having something meaningful to do can lift depression. Would participating in a study to help develop drugs to treat depression be a meaningful thing to do?
205 posted on 05/14/2002 2:50:02 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry, al b.
This is what I found:

http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice/overview.htm?topic=DES%20Diethylstilbestrol

206 posted on 05/14/2002 6:26:01 PM PDT by a history buff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: watchin
I'm clinically depressed.

Every time I go to a clinic, I get depressed.

207 posted on 05/15/2002 1:10:48 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I miss the 1950s mentality. I miss the 1250s mentality even more. I am not kidding, I do. Take a step back and think about it. Look at the world TODAY and think REALLY HARD about it!
208 posted on 05/15/2003 3:42:41 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Layoffs will continue until morale improves."
209 posted on 05/15/2003 3:55:32 PM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
In a lot of ways, I'd like to go back to the 1950's myself. But, still, I'll stick with my earlier posts on this thread. As for 1250, no way!, for many reasons, one of which is that I enjoy modern conveniences way too much.
210 posted on 05/15/2003 4:42:29 PM PDT by Amore (I hate tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Alas
With all due respect, my grandmother was as devout a Christian as you'll find. And she suffered from depression. Antidepressants worked for her when nothing else would. It's a physical disease that can be very treatable.
211 posted on 05/15/2003 4:46:52 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Nice, simple, logical post you've made. Too bad so many on this oft-wonderful site refuse to accept it.
212 posted on 05/15/2003 4:51:00 PM PDT by Amore (I hate tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Did you ever read SUGAR BLUES? I've cut down a lot too.
213 posted on 05/15/2003 4:54:48 PM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anamensis
I haven't read Sugar Blues. How was it?
214 posted on 05/16/2003 2:19:33 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Sugar Blues is pretty interesting. It was written some 30 years ago but is still in print, just one guy's story about ditching sugar completely and the difference it made in his health. There is also a lot of history on the cultivation of sugar (which was of less interest to me). Overall, very interesting story.
215 posted on 05/16/2003 5:19:00 PM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson