Posted on 05/04/2002 8:53:17 PM PDT by Stultis
War-weary Palestinians losing faith in Arafat's leadership The president, says Swaiti, stayed mostly in his office. He would usually appear twice a day - once in the morning, issuing instructions about how to sandbag the windows or prop cupboards against doors, and once in the evening, when he would take supper 'with his men', consisting, initially, of bread and olives. 'Arafat always exuded strength,' Swaiti said last week. 'He never doubted that he would survive for a moment. We were full of doubt, especially in the first five or six days of the siege. "This is war," he would say, "and we shall win it." This gave us all confidence. We knew he had lived through this before, or worse, in Beirut.' Last week Arafat, his guards and entourage of several hundred were finally released from their siege by Israeli forces. Outside Arafat exhibited the same mood swings as he had shown within his office, oscillating between ill-concealed fury at the devastation the 'Nazi' Israeli army had wreaked on Ramallah and the 'honour' he felt at 'leading a truly heroic people in their struggle for freedom and independence'. He paid homage to that heroism by leading the prayers over 26 Palestinians buried in a parking lot because, under curfew, there had not been time to bury them in a cemetery. Hundreds turned out to greet him on streets strewn with gutted cars and felled trees. But thousands did not. And for good reason, says Islah Jad, a Palestinian analyst. As Arafat turned the act of his survival into a celebration, Palestinians were dividing into two camps - between those who saw his ordeal as a victory against Ariel Sharon and those who would paint it as one of the Palestinians' most serious defeats. 'Israel's invasion of Ramallah wasn't a victory. It was a defeat for us,' said Jad. 'It was a defeat for the national and proto-state institutions we have tried to build over the past eight years. It was defeat for the mindless methods of resistance we have adopted. And it was a defeat for the message that we have tried to convey to the world. How was it that someone like Ariel Sharon successfully managed to present our people's right to resist a brutal military occupation as terrorism?' Jad lives in a neat house a few miles east of Arafat's headquarters. Like Marwan, for 35 days Israeli tanks and snipers besieged her home and family. She felt 'powerless', and 'tired, frustrated and angry' about a leadership and political system that had brought them to such a pass. 'Of the 25 Palestinians killed in Ramallah during siege, 16 were young police officers,' she says. 'They were abandoned by their commanders. Their buildings were destroyed and they were left to fend for themselves against the strongest army in the region. These commanders have to be punished.' She recounts the case of Jad Khalif, a 23-year-old policeman and friend of her son. He was arrested and found days later in a pool of blood, stripped to his underwear, his clothes and boots in a pile beside him. He lay in a morgue for 11 days because nobody could claim him. 'I felt so guilty. I couldn't even tell his family. Their village was cut off by the siege.' Out of such losses lessons must be learnt, she says. 'It is not a question of challenging Arafat's leadership. It is a question of telling him that the PA cannot be run the way it has been up to now. If we are to have national institutions, they must be run professionally. If there is to be armed resistance, it must be against soldiers and settlers in the occupied territories. We must stop all attacks against civilians in Israel. And if we are to have peace with Israel, we must convey the message that our struggle is not against its existence as a state. We accept its existence. It is against Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. This we will never accept.' Will Arafat heed her message? 'I hope so,' she says. But as he trawled around Ramallah on Thursday, Arafat was surrounded by the same cronies and signalled the same conflicting messages: now vowing 'peace with the Israelis', now promising '1,000 martyrs to liberate Jerusalem'. And everywhere he flashed V-for-victory salutes. 'Lord spare any more such victories,' said a former Palestinian negotiator. 'We really don't need any more victory celebrations. We need the wisdom of the defeated.'
As the West Bank counts its dead, the President's jaded rhetoric is wearing thin, reports Graham Usher in Ramallah
Observer Worldview
Sunday May 5, 2002
The Observer
For 35 days, Marwan Swaiti was one of 10 Palestinian guards left alone to defend a three-storey block in Yasser Arafat's presidential headquarters in Ramallah. His orders were simple: 'To defend the presidential office until the last man, including the death of the president himself.'
Considering the "settlers" are civilians themsleves, they haven't learned nearly enough. I guess to her deliberately shooting 5-year old girls hiding under a bed is an act of Islamic heroism.
Boy, I get tired of hearing this called a siege. A siege is an attempt to destroy or capture an objective. The Israelis obviously had the capability to capture or kill Arafat at any time. That they chose not to was their decision, not due to any resistance by the Palestinians.
Crushing the terrorists works
Appeasing them doesn't
Bush slamming Arafat would increase Arafat's stock with his constituents.
This deal Bush approved, on the other hand, has truly hurt Yasser. Perhaps a bit more and his own people will dispose of him.
A much wiser strategy I believe.
A tad overwrought I'd say.
"He even tried negotiating with the Taliban."
Not an example Arafat would like you to use.
I think the Palestinians will be responsible for the next civilians killed in Israel.
Why do you continue to try and make Bush the enemy in this when he is not even one of the participants in battle. He is trying to resolve things - same as all other presidents have. He does not have the bombs, he does not shoot - he only tries to find a way for BOTH SIDES to accept peace.
Oh, and also Bush does not get to chose who he has to negotiate with. He negotiates and tries to find peace with the ones fighting. It would be really nice if all the bad people in the world fit our criteria so that we could deal with them. However, we are trying to clear the world of terrorists and to do so we will have to deal with the people in this world - good, bad, indifferent if they are involved.
But maybe my ears are offtune.
The homicide bombings diminished in frequency.
Sharon was also able to further expose the EU and UN for what they truly are as well.
Sharon has exposed Kofi as having direct knowledge of a UNWRA UN funded refugee camp being allowed to be used as a safe haven for arms and terrorist training, making Kofi a war criminal.
The now clearly debunked claims of a massacre in Jenin will diminish the credence lent to claims of a massacre in Deir Yassin.
Even the pretext for the last 18 months of homicide bombings has been revealed as a fraud.
Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount was approved in advance by Jibril Rajoub, the head of the Palestinian Authority's Preventive Security service. Rajoub even stated there would be no reaction.
While the PLO seizing perhaps the most sacred Christian site could be made a big deal worthy of a huge amount of violence directed at the Arab people.
Sharon won big, bigger than we currently know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.