Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: l33t
They also have a major population bomb that's getting much closer to exploding and taking their entire system down with them. They already are taxed at close to 90% of their income and a Swede in the top 5% has $5,000 US in the bank and owns their home. The population is growing at less than replacement something like 1.25 to 1.5 per couple and continuing to drop. They have a fairly large population bubble of baby boomers that's just approaching the age that they will be leaving the work force. Since the populations behind them to support them in their old age is much smaller it would require a larger chunch of tax $$ to support them. When you are being taxed at 95% already it doesn't leave room for a tax increase. The only alternative is to cut services or perhaps get the old people to die off more quickly so they aren't a burden on society. If they take in a lot of immigrants to support their older people they loose their culture as the real Swedes become a smaller and smaller minority in their own country over time. No matter which way they go it's a no win situation.
11 posted on 05/04/2002 3:56:24 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: airedale; Torie
They also have a major population bomb that's getting much closer to exploding and taking their entire system down with them. They already are taxed at close to 90% of their income and a Swede in the top 5% has $5,000 US in the bank and owns their home. The population is growing at less than replacement something like 1.25 to 1.5 per couple and continuing to drop. They have a fairly large population bubble of baby boomers that's just approaching the age that they will be leaving the work force. Since the populations behind them to support them in their old age is much smaller it would require a larger chunch of tax $$ to support them. When you are being taxed at 95% already it doesn't leave room for a tax increase. The only alternative is to cut services or perhaps get the old people to die off more quickly so they aren't a burden on society. If they take in a lot of immigrants to support their older people they loose their culture as the real Swedes become a smaller and smaller minority in their own country over time. No matter which way they go it's a no win situation.

Curiously, the life expectancy in Sweeden is higher than in the United States (despite Sweeden's socialism).

And if People in Sweeden are living longer, they must be pretty healthy.

And if they're so healthy, let them work longer. No problem.

27 posted on 05/04/2002 4:12:11 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: airedale
Re: Your analysis.

Not only all of that but of every three dollars of gov't dole-outs, one of them is borrowed!

(according to P. J. O'Rourke, "Eat The Rich")

35 posted on 05/04/2002 4:17:43 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: airedale
Losing "real Swedes" is not, from the American perspective, a disaster.

In the 19th Century half the people in Sweden got on boats and came here. The place did not improve as a consequence.

58 posted on 05/04/2002 4:50:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson