Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pyx
Do you realize that developers have little to say about what language they use? A survey such as this is useless, and not because it isn't glowing with Microsoft praise. It is useless because it does not measure the use, or intended use, by the people who actually decide. On three projects just this past week that I am involved with, there are over 50 developers who will be using C# and .NET on major projects within the next two months. They are currently using UNIX/C++, ASP, and Visual Basic 6. I just know that they, and their cross section, were not included in that survey.

As Harr stated in a thread last month, let's wait a year and see who is actually using .NET and what its growth has been. We know the use and growth of Java, C++, VB, and ASP because they have been around at least five years. To say that .NET and C# are dead would be clairvoyant, and I don't think any of us is that good. Hell, there were plenty of people putting down Java when I picked it up, and loved it, who said Java was a toy like Visual Basic. Yes, it was at first, but it was a server toy and nice change from client side computing and server side C++ services!

My predictions, what they are worth, are that it will be a typical industry split; 40% to .NET or Java and 60% to the other. They will find their niche markets and the other will have a hard time competing in that market. The companies, Microsoft and Sun, will not be friendly and the developers will be just as bad. The industry will tire of us and decide for itself. Our word will seem to be biased, making the selling of the project hard. Some companies and projects will pick their technology and do very well, while the rest will bicker and fail.

My choice; I will concentrate on .NET while my peer will concentrate on J2EE. We will work together to sell the right solution, and part of that will be the client's personal choice. We will present costs and capabilities, and chose the solution we will present based on actual facts and the needs of our clients. My prediction is that .NET will work best, at the best cost, at least 90% of the time for new projects and it will be a toss up for existing ones. Anyone who has any experience, and has listened to their clients, knows that they will not dump a $10 million Oracle installation for SQL Server, and likewise. .NET will make its best appearance on new projects where the customer wants a fast development time, cheaper costs, including resources, and desires an integrated solution; one product suite for it all. Of course, the J2EE fellow will argue the same thing. Such is technology.

75 posted on 05/05/2002 4:22:03 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: PatrioticAmerican
Do you realize that developers have little to say about what language they use?

It depends on how junior you are. If you are higher up in the food chain, you get paid the big bucks to make the tough decisions like, 'what is my personal favorite language based on what some salesman once told me ?'.

Of course, if technical merit were always part of the decision making process, MicroSoft wouldn't exist and the we wouldn't get to be entertained by Bush2000 and his gloating and celebrating others losing their jobs in the IT market or Bush2000's bragging about a proprietary programming language that NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-SIX OUT OF ONE THOUSAND developers do not use.

:)
78 posted on 05/05/2002 6:00:38 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson