[PatrioticAmerican]

P.S. I do not work for Microsoft, and never have. I do have 23 years with their products and technologies, and I have a close relationship with Microsoft.

For the record, I now work for Ciber as a Microsoft practice manager. We know you work for CSC, and Bush2000 and InnocentBystander work or have worked for Microsoft, just to set the table of who's who.

[ikka]

I do have 23 years with their products and technologies, and I have a close relationship with Microsoft.

Yes, you have your head up their @$$.

[Dominic Harr]

For the record, I now work for Ciber as a Microsoft practice manager. We know you work for CSC, and Bush2000 and InnocentBystander work or have worked for Microsoft, just to set the table of who's who.

Exactly.

I'm the only one here not paid to develop in any specific language. The choice of technology is completely up to me, based upon real-world evaluation.

You sell .NET solutions, and just (in my opinion) failed the honest salesman test.

Just for the record, do I have it correct that you're claiming there are no critical issues known in the current .NET release?

As you said, it's probably every bit as 'ready for prime time' as XP was at release.

And ya'll vanished the day the 'UPnP' exploit was announced. Bush2k even stayed away for an entire week, then when he came back tried to pretend no exploit had happened.

Once again salesmen selling MS solutions are insisting that there is no downside to a product they're selling. When known problems exist.

You're even insisting that IIS is a quality web server.

My experience proves these assertions to be a blantant falsehoods.