Replies

What would happen if, instead of saying that both of them were our Friends, we simply declared neutrality and refrained from sending Financial, Diplomatic, or Military aid to any of the involved parties?

Call me an 'Isolationist,' but I've yet to see a 'Refutation for Dummies' explanation (i.e. one that even I could grasp) of why Pat Buchanan isn't right concerning why we should keep to ourselves, look after our own interest first, form no long-standing associations with other countries (which wind up corrupting our own self-interest), and, in general, STOP ACTING LIKE AN EMPIRE.

Waiting for help!

I think Dr. Makow is dead-on correct. I've served overseas in U.S. Embassies and Consulates since 1988 and have noticed that in the last 8 - 9 years that most of our ambassadors no longer serve the U.S. nor its citizens; they serve the WB and the IMF. Their priority goal is to get whatever nation they're serving in to accept a huge loan from the WB and/or the IMF and surrender their national sovereignty. I saw this while Clinton was president and thus far there have been no changes under Bush.

Apart from the money, why does the World Bank promote the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? To distract and inflame the people of the world and to make the Arabs look bad. Just stupid propaganda. How does WB promote terrorism, for instance. The previous paragraph attempts to show that they support Pal. Authority despite its terror attacks, but this is not the same as supporting terrorism.

What kind of expression is "Jewish bankers," "depopulation agenda?" This article could have been written by "professional" Arab writers who similarly allege that the Jewish doctors inject HIV into Arab babies.

Why did you bother to post this?

The Israel-Palestine conflict is designed to inflame hatred so the elite can wage its war on Islam.

Excuse me but why?

Taking over Russia or Africa would be far more practical and far easier.

The Islamic world would be the very last place on my lists of places to take over in my quest to take over the world.

a.cricket

The world is controlled by an interlocking cartel (oil, banking, media etc.) that is slowly institutionalizing its power in a friendly fascist "world government." This agenda involves the continued destruction of the nation state, democracy, family, religion and western civilization. The "war on terror" is a fabrication designed to advance these ends.

That is a good description of the New World Order!!!!

The NWO characteristically uses muslim thugs and savages to do its dirty work. That is most clearly seen in the Balkans, but has also been true since 1980 Afghanistan and maybe before that (perhaps in Lebanon). (Of course, the NWO was much less developed then than it is now--no World Trade Organization, for example.) But the muslims have their world domination plans, too. The Rest Of Us are caught in between.

The unwashed muslim shills demonstrating for "Palestine" at those so-called "anti-globalization" demonstrations were just taking advantage of the opportunity. They are NOT REALLY anti-globalization at all--but they have co-opted the movement! That's because the anti-globalization demonstrations attracted a mixed group of people--including general malcontents--from the beginning. The pro-"Palestinian"crowd just came in with the malcontents and swamped out any genuine anti-globalization movement. (I am anti-globalization, and was an activist until the crazies and malcontents took over--take it from someone who knows!!!)

Besides that, around 95% of the pro-"Palestinian" demonstrators and leaders were screaming for Serbian blood and total "humanitarian" war in 1999! Anyone who is genuinely anti-globalization was at least against that war, if not pro-Serbian.

The NWO targeted and continues to target Serbia and Orthodox Christianity in general for destruction, and the muslim thugs are their henchmen in this evil plot.

I have spent some time on this subject of world domination by the banker-elites, and I am still not convinced it is a legitimate conspiracy.

Though I am by no means ruling it out.

The Israeli-Palestinian fight seems to fit the pattern, in that it involves the "institutionalization of conflicting interests", to borrow a phrase coined by someone whose names escapes me at the moment. Also, I don't doubt that there is some "capitalization" going on, that benefits the likes of the Rockefellers et al; however, I think it is a bit of a stretch to suggest that they [the bankers] are soley responsible for instituting the conflict, when the religion of Islam has enough intrinsic militant qualities, this coupled with the oil and the overall political dynamic of the region, along with the presence of the sworn enemy of Isalm, the Jews present on Allah's soil--

--I say they would be fighting bankers or no.

Brian.