Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ecomcon
He had direct contact with one of the hijackers 30-40 times, he had videotapes and pictures of his hero, OBL. It's mindboggling that we Americans are losing some of our rights to protect ourselves from these sleepers yet this liberal clinton-appointed judge decides that this guy should have his constitutional rights!
12 posted on 04/30/2002 1:07:31 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: freeperfromnj
Why didn't the government just charge him with "terrorist activities" instead of illegally detaining him under a provision that relates to pre-trial activities and not grand jury investigations?

If Asscroft wants to charge any of these foreign terrorist associates or sympethizers as "terrorists", then I have no problem, providing there is proof. Just don't manipulate the law to your liking.

Bottom line, they will not deport these KNOWN TERRORISTS for a reason. What is it? They knew these people were associates of terrorists long before 9/11. Every American needs to ask the hard question, "Why, oh why, would our government let known terrorists and associates into this country in the first place". No other questions are needed.

15 posted on 04/30/2002 1:12:37 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: freeperfromnj
The 1st amendment guarantees child pornographers access to your child's home computer, and freedom to foreign terrorists on US soil. But the 2nd amendment allows you to shoot them!
42 posted on 04/30/2002 2:42:55 PM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson