Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomkat
So, then with regards to 267/268, are you saying then that the school is required to adopt an anything goes attitude...isn't that what you all are decrying vis-a-vis condoms, and the rest of the sex ed curriculum?
279 posted on 04/30/2002 8:50:38 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: hobbes1
isn't that what you all are decrying vis-a-vis condoms, and the rest of the sex ed curriculum?

Distributing condoms and teaching sex-ed is a violation of PARENTAL RIGHTS. Government schools have no authority to do that. But they also cannot tell parents how to dress their minor children. That is a violation of parental rights also. Hell, mandatory public education is a violation of parental rights in and of itself.

282 posted on 04/30/2002 8:56:32 AM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1
So, then with regards to 267/268, are you saying then that the school is required to adopt an anything goes attitude...
isn't that what you all are decrying vis-a-vis condoms, and the rest of the sex ed curriculum?

you are attempting, none to nimbly, to avoid the main issue here.

what of the young woman who, while wearing a thong, also chose to wear a knee-length, yet 'billowy' skirt ?
in the course of a dance, while executing some kind of spin step, the billowing of said skirt exposes the evil thong.
further, assume that the girl in the mini/grannie drawers combo is a wallflower type, and would have stayed true to form throughout the dance.

why was one subjected to public humiliation and the other was not ?

288 posted on 04/30/2002 9:01:51 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson