Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot
The author did not avoid it. He addressed the issue and rejected an auto-da-fe (for homosexuals qua homosexuals). You simply disagree. Pederastery is a crime.
12 posted on 04/27/2002 10:44:41 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
He addressed the issue and rejected an auto-da-fe (for homosexuals qua homosexuals).

I reject his "auto-da-fe" and raise him one Romans Chapter 1, versus 21 - 27.

21For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. 24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen. 26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

16 posted on 04/27/2002 11:00:01 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson