This so-called "unfortunate condemnation of married Roman Catholics" is not Renatus'at all, but the universal teaching of Roman Catholicism.
See Humanae Vitae.
Or the Catechism of the Catholic Church for that matter.
But don't condemn Renatus for simply pointing out that all of Christianity for all time has condemned contraception, and the reformers called it sodomitic sin. All sex made deliberately non-procreative is sinful. That is Natural Law and the constant unanimous teaching of the entire history of Christian moral theology (until of course the protestants abandoned same teaching in 1930)
When I see posts such as yours its hard not to conclude that you are trying to rationalize/justify your own mortal sin of contraception and/or sterilization. (Of course, to conclude such would be making a dangerous assumption, so I will refrain from doing so.)
Oh, Yes, I said mortal sin.
You know, the kind for which one can go to Hell for eternity when done with full consent and knowledge? That too is still a teaching of Roman Catholicism.
And pigs fly.
There you go again.
Your completely false and whole cloth fabrication that contraceptives play a role within my marriage is on par with Renatus describing all married Roman Catholics as degenerates - killers of the unborn - asserting the baseless and foolish argument that all Roman Catholics having received the Sacrament of Matrimony must, by default, use contraceptives.
What hospital gave you guys access to a computer?