"In the initial document release three weeks ago, records showed that Shanley spoke in favor of sex between men and boys at a December 1978 Boston convention that led to the founding of the intergenerational sex advocacy organization. But a Shanley supporter who organized the meeting and later co-founded NAMBLA insists that it has been mischaracterized, and that many different points of view on the subject were presented."
What the...?!
There is absolutely no excuse for Shanley even being there much less speaking on it. Am I the only one seeing this?
"More germane to the accusations of MacLeish's clients is Socrates' contention that it would have been totally out of character for Shanley to have had violent sex with a 6-year-old."
Huh?
You believe it was in his character to have gentle sex with a small boy?
Idiot.
"I don't believe it, based on what I know of him, I don't believe he ever did anything by force."
Simply an amazing statement. Apparently this Kid must've wanted it right?
Bottom line...
If one of these faggot priests ever laid a hand on my kid, the concern over a cover-up or civil proceedings would be a non-issue...
In front of God and Country I would without hesitation fill him up with .50 Desert Eagle rounds and let the rest of our pussyfied society worry about the pros & cons.