Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC Burke
Those that have defended these biologists have unwittingly underminded the lynx research even further. One of the methods of this "defending the biologists" has been to support their position that there is something inadequate about the National Lynx Detection Protocol that requires these low level employees to test the system.

The Detection Protocol was designed by lynx expert McKelvey to, among other things, be sure that the lynx would not be over or under detected. When these biologists and their supporters bad mouth the Protocol for underdetecting, they are also implying that that overdetection is likely. Or that the Protocol is flawed.

McKelvey did a newspaper interview(which I can't find now) in which he blasted these biolgists and their supporters because of the damage they are doing. McKelvey's testimony at the Congressional Hearings, in which he tries to defend the Protocol, is here

47 posted on 04/23/2002 5:35:24 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin
We we know from the Eco-terrorism at Vail, that the Leftist Envirnmentalists will do any crime necessary to advance the anti-growth, anti-human agenda on so-called Lynx habitat.
61 posted on 04/24/2002 8:32:36 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson