Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01; keri; Nogbad; The Great Satan; Alamo-Girl; Shermy; right_to_defend
Thanks for the ping, okie01.

There's not really much new in this article, but it does show what the effect of the purported domestic focus is. Those people who realize that the anthrax is almost certainly associated with 9/11 are stuck at the stage of arguing for that (vs. a supposed domestic source). This is basically a diversion.

We should instead be discussing how exactly the anthrax letters fit into the other side's strategy and what the anthrax mailings reveal about who our opponents are and what they are doing.

10 posted on 04/19/2002 10:47:49 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mitchell
We should instead be discussing
how exactly the anthrax letters fit
into the other side's strategy
and what the anthrax mailings reveal
about who our opponents are
and what they are doing.

I am beginning to think the anthrax issue is small potatoes.

I don't believe Iraq ever destroyed its smallpox samples
as it was asked to do by the WHO.

15 posted on 04/19/2002 11:09:45 PM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Mitchell
I agree that our major concern needs to be the use of biochem as a WMD by a nation-state!
16 posted on 04/19/2002 11:23:32 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson