To: thinden
And who gets to decide which informationis "significant?" And to which side? One suspects what was "lost" was probably not particularly helpful to the State's case.
To: MizSterious; glorygirl; thinden
""I read the documents. I identified a very large number of them that I thought were material to Terry Nichols' defense," he said, adding that he could not discuss specifics because the documents remain under seal." Two major considerations must always be made in matters like this ----- The State must win. And Someone other than The State Goons must pay the price.
Did I mention that The State must Win?
23 posted on
04/18/2002 9:03:24 AM PDT by
rdavis84
To: MizSterious
That which does not help the prosecutor's case is often "misplaced". I say charge those responsible for the materials with destruction of evidence (whoever has currently signed off on "possession" of evidence). That would light a fire under their butts to find the materials.
I hold this to all cases big and small.
28 posted on
04/18/2002 1:08:02 PM PDT by
weegee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson