Posted on 04/17/2002 9:52:46 AM PDT by gubamyster
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Meanwhile, teachers complain that "standardized testing" gives them "too little time for instruction"... BS! They are afraid test results will reveal their unequivocable weaknesses in teaching the basics.
As opposed to Ponds' socialistic, anti-religious special interest group (the NEA) who's decades-long siege upon our schools and the minds of our children deserves much of the blame for the current, disgusting state of our schools.
"The people involved in these efforts are people with kids in the public schools who want to have an impact," said Ponds. "But there are others who are part of an overall effort to insert religious instruction in the schools and undermine the public schools."
And there are others, like Ponds, who are part of an overall effort to insert socialistic, valueless, anti-religious instruction in the schools and undermine the souls of our children and thus the schools, our families, and our free society.
Heaven forbid some parents get involved and attempt to counter the NEA's poisonous effects on our schools and our children. In a better time Ponds would have been tarred, feathered, and rode out of town on a rail.
How dare those parents interfere in the work of these "experts".
More and more it seems to me that a degree in education is proof positive that you should have absolutley nothing to do with education.
By the way, remember my personal rant:
Average NY Public School spending per student: _______________________________$8,900.00 per year
Spending per student in Putnam Valley NY: ___________________________________$18,600.00 per year
% of Putnam Valley 8th graders who pass the standardized tests: ___________________67% (below 70% is a failing grade)
Putnam Valley Public Schools, all the incompetence at twice the price.
Brought to you by the NEA and the US Department of Education
This is the reason that the NEA decided not to take a vote of all the members last year at their convention, regarding the integration of the homosexual agenda into the curriculum. They were receiving a lot of negative comments from smaller, and more conservative, states that this was just not going to fly, nor did they (the teachers) want to teach this stuff. (The only surprise here being the protest from parents in the MA school.)
This forced the NEA to go into private meetings, and pass the new curriculum standards without any input from their membership.
My husband's brother and his wife live in CA and their oldest girl should be entering kindergarten soon. I asked hubby if he ever talked to his brother and if they were aware what she was going to be subjected to. He didn't know, but it is obvious that a lot of parents are not going to sit by and have this stuff introduced into their children's curriculum. At least, I hope that is the case.
You're joking, right? This is sarcasm... or are you a member of the NEA?
I can't stand the NEA. I don't think they have the slightest concern for kids of for their education. All they care about is their paychecks and employee benefits, and making sure there is no accountability on the part of teachers and administrators (unlike any job in the "real world".) I don't think anything has been more detrimental to education in the U.S. than the NEA, and THEY should be ashamed of themselves.
Howerver, as for teaching creationist theory in public school, it doesn't belong there. It's religious theory, and if you want your kids learning religious theory, take them to Sunday school. Evolution, on the other hand, is scientific theory, whether you like it or not, and science does belong in public schools.
As for other matters, such as discussions of homosexuality and tolerance of "alternate lifestyles", that doesn't belong there either. These are moral teachings which parents are responsible for.
Even sex education barely belongs there. When I was a kid, sex education entailed learning about how babies are made (purely mechanical) and the various STDs. No mention of contraception or abortion was ever made, and never were the words "right" or "wrong" uttered. It was pure science, and I think that was ok.
But this "warm and fuzzy" crap that they're pushing today... I don't know what that is, but I know what it's not -- it's not education.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.